Cited by 41Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

INPP5D mRNA Expression and Cognitive Decline in Japanese Alzheimer’s Disease Subjects

Yoshino, Yuta, Yamazaki, Kiyohiro, Ozaki, Yuki, Sao, Tomoko, Yoshida, Taku, Mori, Takaaki, Mori, Yoko, Ochi, Shinichiro +2 more·2017·Journal of Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Microglial dysfunction and inflammation have recently been shown to be related to the development of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Inositol polyphosphate-5-phosphatase (INPP5D) functions broadly as a negative regulator of immune signaling, and its locus was associated with development of AD in a large-scale genome-wide association study. Thus, we examined INPP5D mRNA expression and methylation rates of the CpG sites in the upstream region of INPP5D exon 1 in peripheral leukocytes in 50 AD and age- and sex-matched control subjects. INPP5D mRNA expression in AD subjects was significantly higher than that in control subjects (1.16±0.39 versus 1.0±0.23, p = 0.049) and was correlated with the Mini-Mental State Examination score (p = 0.002, r = 0.426) and the total score of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (p < 0.001, r = -0.697). Methylation rates in the upstream region of INPP5D exon 1 were not significantly different between AD and control subjects (average rate: 3.5±3.0 versus 2.8±1.3, p = 0.551). Our results suggested that INPP5D mRNA expression was elevated in the early stage and decreased with cognitive decline in AD. INPP5D mRNA expression in leukocytes may be a useful biomarker for the early stage of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-161211

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yoshino, Y., Yamazaki, K., Ozaki, Y., Sao, T., Yoshida, T., Mori, T., Mori, Y., Ochi, S., Iga, J.-I., & Ueno, S.-I.
Affiliations
Ehime University (JP)
Corresponding author
Iga, Jun-Ichi
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Published
2017-06-05
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
687-694
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2610941844
Cited by
41
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (15K09808)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
INPP5D, inositol polyphosphate 5-phosphatase
MeSH terms
Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-Phosphatases, Mental Status and Dementia Tests, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Female, Humans, Male, RNA, Messenger, Severity of Illness Index, Biomarkers, Gene Expression, CpG Islands, DNA Methylation, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review