The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Connected speech features from picture description in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
The language changes that occur over the course of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) can impact communication abilities and have profound functional consequences. Picture description tasks can be used to approximate everyday communication abilities of AD patients. As various methods and variables have been studied over the years, current knowledge about the most affected features of AD discourse in the context of picture descriptions is difficult to summarize. This systematic review aims to provide researchers with an overview of the most common areas of impairment in AD discourse as they appear in picture description tasks. Based on the 44 articles fulfilling inclusion criteria, our findings reflect a multidimensional pattern of changes in the production (speech rate), syntactic (length of utterance), lexical (word-frequency and use of pronouns), fluency (repetitions and word-finding difficulties), semantic (information units), and discourse (efficiency) domains. We discuss our findings in the light of current research and point to potential scientific and clinical uses of picture description tasks in the context of AD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Initiatives like the Alzheimer’s disease imaging initiative (ADNI) have established best practices for acquisition and preprocessing, while large-scale studies such as the UK Biobank have advanced standardization for diverse MRI techniques.71–74”
From Review of Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Use in Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias (2026) · cites this paper as [74]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. M. (1984) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.34.7.939 · Cited by 27,915
PRISMA-P Group, Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 · Cited by 26,223
McKhann, G. M., Knopman, D. S., Chertkow, H., Hyman, B. T., Jack, C. R., Kawas, C. H., Klunk, W. E., Koroshetz, W. J., Manly, J. J., Mayeux, R., et al. (2011) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 · Cited by 18,657
A New Clinical Scale for the Staging of Dementia
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W., Coben, L. A., & Martin, R. L. (1982) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.140.6.566 · Cited by 7,056
Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.2.211 · Cited by 6,282
The Global Deterioration Scale for assessment of primary degenerative dementia
Reisberg, ., Ferris, S. H., de Leon, M. J., & Crook, T. H. (1982) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.139.9.1136 · Cited by 5,122
Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews
Mulrow, C. D. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.309.6954.597 · Cited by 1,677
Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer's disease: A critical review
Perry, R. J. (1999) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/122.3.383 · Cited by 1,252
The Medical Review Article: State of the Science
MULROW, C. D. (1987) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485 · Cited by 856
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Ska B, 2005, Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil, 3, 125
- 10.1017/S1355617701020082 · DOI
- Tomoeda CK, 1993, Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord, 7, 223
- Goodglass H, 2000, Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination-(BDAE-3)
- Aluisio S, 2016, International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, XII; Demonstration Session
- Dijkers M, 2015, KT Update, 4, 1
- Berndt RS, 2000, Quantitative production analysis a training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production
- Cherney LR, 1993, Clin Aphasiol, 21, 123
- Kertesz A, 1982, Western aphasia battery test manual
- Semenza C, 1989, Neuropsicologia con carta e matita
- Nespoulous J, 1992, Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d’examen linguistique de l’aphasie (MT86)
- Choi H, 2009, Korean J Commun Disord, 14, 326
- Aluísio S, 2016, International Conference on Computational Processing of the Portuguese Language, 109
- Zraick RI, 2011, J Med Speech Lang Pathol, 19, 37
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Martínez‐Nicolás, I., Llorente, T. E., Martínez‐Sánchez, F., & Meilán, J. J. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620251 · Cited by 187
Comparing Pre-trained and Feature-Based Models for Prediction of Alzheimer's Disease Based on Speech
Balagopalan, A., Eyre, B., Robin, J., Rudzicz, F., & Novikova, J. (2021) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.635945 · Cited by 106
Filiou, R.-P., Bier, N., Slegers, A., Houzé, B., Belchior, P. D. C., & Brambati, S. M. (2019) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2019.1608502 · Cited by 100
Self-citationYeung, A., Iaboni, A., Rochon, E. A., Lavoie, M., Santiago, C., Yancheva, M., Novikova, J., Xu, M., Robin, J., Kaufman, L. D., et al. (2021) · Alzheimer s Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/s13195-021-00848-x · Cited by 90
Hecker, P., Steckhan, N., Eyben, F., Schuller, B. W., & Arnrich, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2022.842301 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Slegers, A., Filiou, R.-P., Montembeault, M., & Brambati, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Institut Universitaire de Gériatrie de Montréal (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Brambati, Simona Maria
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-07-30
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 519-542
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W2886871786
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 118
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- Alzheimer's disease, picture description task
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Language Disorders, Neuropsychological Tests, Speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
