Cited by 27

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dipeptidyl-Peptidase Activity of Meprin β Links N-truncation of Aβ with Glutaminyl Cyclase-Catalyzed pGlu-Aβ Formation

Schlenzig, Dagmar, Cynis, Holger, Hartlage-Rübsamen, Maike, Zeitschel, Ulrike, Menge, Katja, Fothe, Anja, Ramsbeck, Daniel, Spahn, Claudia, Wermann, Michael, Roßner, Steffen, Buchholz, Mirko, Schilling, Stephan, Demuth, Hans-Ulrich·2018·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

The formation of amyloid-β (Aβ) peptides is causally involved in the development of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A significant proportion of deposited Aβ is N-terminally truncated and modified at the N-terminus by a pGlu-residue (pGlu-Aβ). These forms show enhanced neurotoxicity compared to full-length Aβ. Although the truncation may occur by aminopeptidases after formation of Aβ, recently discovered processing pathways of amyloid-β protein precursor (AβPP) by proteases such as meprin β may also be involved. Here, we assessed a role of meprin β in forming Aβ 3 -40/42 , which is the precursor of pGlu-Aβ 3 -40/42 generated by glutaminyl cyclase (QC). Similar to QC, meprin β mRNA is significantly upregulated in postmortem brain from AD patients. A histochemical analysis supports the presence of meprin β in neurons and astrocytes in the vicinity of pGlu-Aβ containing deposits. Cleavage of AβPP-derived peptides by meprin β in vitro results in peptides Aβ 1 -x , Aβ 2 -x , and Aβ 3 -x . The formation of N-truncated Aβ by meprin β was also corroborated in cell culture. A subset of the generated peptides was converted into pGlu-Aβ 3 -40 by an addition of glutaminyl cyclase, supporting the preceding formation of Aβ 3 -40 . Further analysis of the meprin β cleavage revealed a yet unknown dipeptidyl-peptidase–like activity specific for the N-terminus of Aβ 1 -x . Thus, our data suggest that meprin β contributes to the formation of N-truncated Aβ by endopeptidase and exopeptidase activity to generate the substrate for QC-catalyzed pGlu-Aβ formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-171183

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. 10.1074/jbc.M501694200 · DOI
  2. 10.1159/000369465 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.027 · DOI
  4. 10.1021/bi800250p · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07707.x · DOI
  6. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01107.x · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.08.015 · DOI
  8. 10.1074/jbc.M115.655183 · DOI
  9. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1794-11.2011 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1074/jbc.M111.308601 · DOI
  11. 10.1038/nature11060 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.08.037 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.08.021 · DOI
  14. 10.1186/s13024-016-0115-2 · DOI
  15. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2008.05471.x · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nm.1872 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05950.x · DOI
  18. SchechterI, ZivE (2011) CathepsinsS, B and L with aminopeptidases display ß-secretase activity associated with the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Biol Chem 555, 555–569.
  19. 10.1074/jbc.M112.395608 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1515/BC.2008.124 · DOI
  21. 10.1042/bj3110299 · DOI
  22. 10.1002/1531-8249(200003)47:3<399::AID-ANA22>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/s13024-016-0084-5 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.3389/fnmol.2016.00159 · DOI
  25. 10.1074/mcp.M111.009233 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s10561-008-9067-2 · DOI
  27. MirraSS, HeymanA, McKeelD, SumiSM, CrainBJ, BrownleeLM, VogelFS, HughesJP, van BelleG, BergL (1991) The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD). Part II. Standardization of the neuropathologic assessment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 41, 479–486.
  28. National Institute on Aging (1997) Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. The National Institute on Aging, and Reagan Institute Working Group on Diagnostic Criteria for the Neuropathological Assessment of Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurobiol Aging 18, S1–S2.
  29. 10.1096/fj.01-0995fje · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0896-6273(95)90301-1 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1016/S0197-4580(98)00033-5 · DOI
  32. 10.3233/JAD-131535 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/brain/awt362 · DOI
  34. 10.1007/s00401-014-1296-9 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/bi900818a · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1186/1471-2202-14-108 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2006.08.003 · DOI
  38. 10.1021/bi015800g · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/s00401-011-0806-2 · DOI
  40. 10.1042/bj20021398 · DOI
  41. 10.1046/j.1432-1327.1999.00268.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0197-4580(02)00018-0 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schlenzig, D., Cynis, H., Hartlage-Rübsamen, M., Zeitschel, U., Menge, K., Fothe, A., Ramsbeck, D., Spahn, C., Wermann, M., Roßner, S., Buchholz, M., Schilling, S., & Demuth, H.-U.
Affiliations
  • Department of Molecular Drug Design and Target Validation Fraunhofer Institute for Cell Therapy and Immunology, Halle (Saale), Germany
  • Paul Flechsig Institute for Brain Research, Leipzig, Germany
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2018-09-29
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
359-375
ISSN
  • 1387-2877
  • 1875-8908
Cited by
27
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review