The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Is Caffeine a Cognitive Enhancer?
Open accessAbstract
The effects of caffeine on cognition were reviewed based on the large body of literature available on the topic. Caffeine does not usually affect performance in learning and memory tasks, although caffeine may occasionally have facilitatory or inhibitory effects on memory and learning. Caffeine facilitates learning in tasks in which information is presented passively; in tasks in which material is learned intentionally, caffeine has no effect. Caffeine facilitates performance in tasks involving working memory to a limited extent, but hinders performance in tasks that heavily depend on working memory, and caffeine appears to rather improve memory performance under suboptimal alertness conditions. Most studies, however, found improvements in reaction time. The ingestion of caffeine does not seem to affect long-term memory. At low doses, caffeine improves hedonic tone and reduces anxiety, while at high doses, there is an increase in tense arousal, including anxiety, nervousness, jitteriness. The larger improvement of performance in fatigued subjects confirms that caffeine is a mild stimulant. Caffeine has also been reported to prevent cognitive decline in healthy subjects but the results of the studies are heterogeneous, some finding no age-related effect while others reported effects only in one sex and mainly in the oldest population. In conclusion, it appears that caffeine cannot be considered a ;pure' cognitive enhancer. Its indirect action on arousal, mood and concentration contributes in large part to its cognitive enhancing properties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fredholm, B. B., Bättig, K., Holmén, J., Nehlig, A., & Zvartau, E. E. (1999) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(24)01396-6 · Cited by 2,624 · cited 1×
“Caffeine half-life ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 h in humans (for review see [2]).”
InfluentialSelf-citationHumphreys, M. S., & Revelle, W. (1984) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.91.2.153 · Cited by 831
The multi-component model of working memory: Explorations in experimental cognitive psychology
RepovŠ, G., & Baddeley, A. (2006) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.12.061 · Cited by 795
Effects of caffeine on human behavior
Smith, A. (2002) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(02)00096-0 · Cited by 741
Are we dependent upon coffee and caffeine? A review on human and animal data
Nehlig, A. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(98)00050-5 · Cited by 453
Self-citationENHANCEMENT OF HUMAN PERFORMANCE BY CAFFEINE AND THE AMPHETAMINES
WEISS, B., & LATIES, V. G. (1962) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0031-6997(25)07003-6 · Cited by 443
Dose‐Dependent Pharmacokinetics and Psychomotor Effects of Caffeine in Humans
Kaplan, G. B., Greenblatt, D. J., Ehrenberg, B. L., Goddard, J. E., Cotreau, M. M., Harmatz, J. S., & Shader, R. I. (1997) · The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1997.tb04356.x · Cited by 386
Haskell, C. F., Kennedy, D. O., Wesnes, K. A., & Scholey, A. B. (2005) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-004-2104-3 · Cited by 356
The neuroprotective effects of caffeine: A prospective population study (the Three City Study)
Ritchie, K., Carrière, I., de Mendonça, A., Portet, F., Dartigues, J. F., Rouaud, O., Barberger-Gateau, P., & Ancelin, M. L. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000266670.35219.0c · Cited by 347
Smit, H. J., & Rogers, P. J. (2000) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130000506 · Cited by 339 · cited 1×
“The effect was more marked in individuals with a high habitual caffeine intake [78].”
Cited by
A Review of Caffeine’s Effects on Cognitive, Physical and Occupational Performance
McLellan, T. M., Caldwell, J. A., & Lieberman, H. R. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.001 · Cited by 840
Interindividual Differences in Caffeine Metabolism and Factors Driving Caffeine Consumption
Nehlig, A. (2018) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.014407 · Cited by 632
Self-citationCaffeine: Cognitive and Physical Performance Enhancer or Psychoactive Drug?
Cappelletti, S., Daria, P., Sani, G., & Aromatario, M. (2015) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x13666141210215655 · Cited by 631
“A wide range of studies in humans suggest that the cognitive benefits of caffeine are associated with relief from withdrawal symptoms, rather than with improvement in cognitive functions [9, 111, 112].”
BackgroundFatigue and its management in the workplace
Caldwell, J. A., Caldwell, J. L., Thompson, L. A., & Lieberman, H. R. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.024 · Cited by 382
Caffeine as an Attention Enhancer: Reviewing Existing Assumptions
Einöther, S. J. L., & Giesbrecht, T. (2013) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-012-2917-4 · Cited by 215
Metadata
- Authors
- Nehlig, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-04-14
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- S85-S94
- ISSN
- 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8908
- OpenAlex
- W2147870248
- Cited by
- 411
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 12.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Is Caffeine a Cognitive Enhancer? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/jad-2010-091315
- The paper
- Nehlig, A. (2010). Is Caffeine a Cognitive Enhancer? Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-2010-091315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.