Cited by 66Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningOnline Learning and AnalyticsArtificial Intelligence in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting Learning Moment-by-Moment

Baker, Ryan S.J.D., Goldstein, Adam B., Heffernan, Neil T.·2011·International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Abstract

Intelligent tutors have become increasingly accurate at detecting whether a student knows a skill, or knowledge component (KC), at a given time. However, current student models do not tell us exactly at which point a KC is learned. In this paper, we present a machine-learned model that assesses the probability that a student learned a KC at a specific problem step (instead of at the next or previous problem step). We use this model to analyze which KCs are learned gradually, and which are learned in “eureka” moments. We also discuss potential ways that this model could be used to improve the effectiveness of cognitive mastery learning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jai-2011-015

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge tracing has been used as a foundation for developing a technique that can infer the exact moment when a learner mastered a particular skill.

    “Knowledge tracing has also been used as a foundation for developing a techniquemoment by knowledge learning (Baker, Goldstein, & Heffernan, 2011;2013) that can infer the exact moment when a learner mastered a particular skill.”

    From Assessment in the age of artificial intelligence (2022) · cites this paper as Baker, Goldstein, & Heffernan, 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baker, R. S. J. D., Goldstein, A. B., & Heffernan, N. T.
Affiliations
Worcester Polytechnic Institute (US)
Venue
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
Publisher
IOS Press
Published
2011-02
Volume
21
Issue
1-2
Pages
5-25
ISSN
  • 1560-4292 (ISSN-L)
  • 1560-4306
OpenAlex
W1636689632
Cited by
66
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Education
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Online Learning and Analytics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
intelligent tutoring systems, student model, eureka moments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review