Cited by 36Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchGastrointestinal motility and disordersParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation improves gastroenteric complaints in Parkinson's disease patients

Kaut, Oliver, Janocha, Laura, Weismüller, Tobias J., Wüllner, Ullrich·2019·NeuroRehabilitation

Abstract

Background Gastrointestinal dysfunctions are common in Parkinson's disease. Their management is still challenging and new treatment options are needed. Objective To test whether transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulation can improve gastrointestinal dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease. Methods We performed a randomized double-blind pilot study enrolling patients suffering from Parkinson's disease with gastroenteric complaints. Patients were randomized to use either a sham-device or to stimulate the vagal nerve with an electric device over the course of four weeks with four stimulations per day. Ten patients (aged 69.6±4.6 years) were randomized for the intervention group, and nine patients (aged 67.2±6.3 years) used a sham-device. Clinical outcome was evaluated using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale whereas gastrointestinal motility was measured with the 13C-octanoic acid breath test. Results In the treatment group, vagal nerve stimulation improved the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale comparing before and after stimulation (before, 8.7±6.09; after 5.67±3.08; p-value 0.48). This improvement was not observed in the sham group (before, 7.44±4.85; after, 5.67±3.08; p-value 0.16). In the 13C-octanoic acid breath test no significant changes were detectable. Conclusions Vagal nerve stimulation is well tolerated with no side effects and may be a promising non-invasive therapy option to improve gastroenteric symptoms in Parkinson's disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/nre-192909

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaut, O., Janocha, L., Weismüller, T. J., & Wüllner, U.
Affiliations
University Hospital Bonn (DE)
Corresponding author
Kaut, Oliver
Venue
NeuroRehabilitation
Published
2019-12-18
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
449-451
ISSN
  • 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6448
OpenAlex
W2995088793
Cited by
36
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DZNE Pub (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, gastrointestinal dysfunction, gastrointestinal motility, 13C-octanoic acid breath test, non-invasive neuromodulation, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Aged, Double-Blind Method, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Vagus Nerve Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review