Impact of frontal lobe lesions on rehabilitation and recovery from acute brain injury
Abstract
The frontal lobe has been viewed historically in very different ways, ranging from enigmatic and mystifying to the crucial neural substrate for higher cognition and social behavior. Frontal lobe damage poses a unique and difficult set of challenges to the patient, their family and the neurorehabilitation team. Because of the role of the frontal lobe in adaptation and adjustment, such damage adversely affects a patient's participation in the process and content of rehabilitation. To aid diagnosis and treatment planning, a model of frontal lobe organization is outlined, focusing on the specific cognitive and behavioral symptom clusters associated with superior mesial, inferior mesial, dorsolateral and orbital frontal lesions. A taxonomy of social executive processes is presented for identifying impairments in social behavior and personality, based upon the domains of social self-regulation, social self-awareness, social-sensitivity (empathy), and social-salience. Specific interventions are described that encompass dopamine agonist therapy for blunted affect, mutism and akinesia, cognitive strategies for improving organization and planning deficits, and evolving treatments for social impairments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Negative urgency impulsivity is associated with significant risk factors for suicide, such as social and occupational functional deficits.
“and is associated with significant risk factors for suicide, such as social and occupational functional deficits [42].”
To ensure tolerability, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the motor threshold and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient's motor threshold over the first few treatment sessions.
“To ensure that the participants can tolerate the treatment, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the MT intensity and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient’s MT intensity over the first few treatment sessions [42].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 73
- Authors
- Eslinger, P. J., Grattan, L. M., & Geder, L.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
- Department of Medicine (Division of Neurology) and University Hospital Rehabilitation Center, College of Medicine, Penn State University, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
- Corresponding author
- Eslinger, Paul J.
- Venue
- NeuroRehabilitation
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-07-01
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-182
- ISSN
- 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
- 1878-6448
- OpenAlex
- W2022782408
- Cited by
- 73
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- frontal lobe lesions, acute brain injury, recovery, social self-regulation, social self-awareness, social sensitivity, social salience, social behavior impairment, personality disorders, blunted affect, mutism, akinesia, dopamine agonist therapy, cognitive strategies, planning deficits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review