Cited by 73Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchCognitive Functions and MemoryNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Impact of frontal lobe lesions on rehabilitation and recovery from acute brain injury

Eslinger, Paul J., Grattan, Lynn M., Geder, Laszlo·1995·NeuroRehabilitation

Abstract

The frontal lobe has been viewed historically in very different ways, ranging from enigmatic and mystifying to the crucial neural substrate for higher cognition and social behavior. Frontal lobe damage poses a unique and difficult set of challenges to the patient, their family and the neurorehabilitation team. Because of the role of the frontal lobe in adaptation and adjustment, such damage adversely affects a patient's participation in the process and content of rehabilitation. To aid diagnosis and treatment planning, a model of frontal lobe organization is outlined, focusing on the specific cognitive and behavioral symptom clusters associated with superior mesial, inferior mesial, dorsolateral and orbital frontal lesions. A taxonomy of social executive processes is presented for identifying impairments in social behavior and personality, based upon the domains of social self-regulation, social self-awareness, social-sensitivity (empathy), and social-salience. Specific interventions are described that encompass dopamine agonist therapy for blunted affect, mutism and akinesia, cognitive strategies for improving organization and planning deficits, and evolving treatments for social impairments.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/nre-1995-5206

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 48 · Cited by 73

Authors
Eslinger, P. J., Grattan, L. M., & Geder, L.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Department of Medicine (Division of Neurology) and University Hospital Rehabilitation Center, College of Medicine, Penn State University, The Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
Corresponding author
Eslinger, Paul J.
Venue
NeuroRehabilitation
Published
1995-07-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
161-182
ISSN
  • 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6448
OpenAlex
W2022782408
Cited by
73
References
48
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
frontal lobe lesions, acute brain injury, recovery, social self-regulation, social self-awareness, social sensitivity, social salience, social behavior impairment, personality disorders, blunted affect, mutism, akinesia, dopamine agonist therapy, cognitive strategies, planning deficits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review