Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 354

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gait and step training to reduce falls in Parkinson's disease

Open access
Protas, Elizabeth J., Mitchell, Katy, Williams, Amanda, Qureshy, Huma, Caroline, Kavitha, Lai, Eugene C.·2005·NeuroRehabilitation

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Frequent falls and risk of injury are evident in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) as the disease progresses. There have been no reports of any interventions that reduce the incidence of falls in idiopathic PD. PURPOSE: Assess the benefit of gait and step perturbation training in individuals with PD. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient research, education and clinical center in a tertiary care Veterans Affairs Medical Center. OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait parameters, 5-step test, report of falls. SUBJECTS: Eighteen men with idiopathic PD in stage 2 or 3 of the Hoehn and Yahr staging. METHODS: Subjects were randomly assigned to a trained or control group. They were asked about any falls 2 weeks prior to and after an 8 week period. Gait speed, cadence, and step length were tested on an instrumented walkway. Subjects were timed while stepping onto and back down from an 8.8 cm step for 5 consecutive steps. Gait training consisted of walking on a treadmill at a speed greater than over ground walking speed while walking in 4 directions and while supported in a harness for safety. Step training consisted of suddenly turning the treadmill on and off while the subject stood in the safety harness facing either forwards, backwards, or sideways. Training occurred 1 hour per day, three times per week for 8 weeks. A two-factor (time and group) analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare the groups. RESULTS: Substantial reduction occurred in falls in the trained group, but not in the control group. Gait speed increased in the trained group from 1.28+/-0.33 meters/sec to 1.45+/-0.37 meters/sec, but not in the control group (from 1.26 to 1.27 m/s). The cadence increased for both groups: from 112.8 to 120.3 steps/min for the trained group and 117.7 to 124.3 steps/min for the control group. Stride lengths increased for the trained group, but not the control group. The 5-step test speed increased in the trained group from 0.40+/-0.08 steps/sec to 0.51+/-0.12 steps/sec, and in the control group (0.36+/-0.11 steps/sec to 0.42+/-0.11 steps/sec). CONCLUSION: Gait and step perturbation training resulted in a reduction in falls and improvements in gait and dynamic balance. This is a promising approach to reduce falls for patients with PD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/nre-2005-20305

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 354

Metadata

Authors
Protas, E. J., Mitchell, K., Williams, A., Qureshy, H., Caroline, K., & Lai, E. C.
Venue
NeuroRehabilitation
Published
2005-10-08
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
183-190
ISSN
  • 1053-8135 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6448
OpenAlex
W205370585
Cited by
354
References
1
FWCI
31.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gait and step training to reduce falls in Parkinson's disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/nre-2005-20305
The paper
Protas, E. J., Mitchell, K., Williams, A., Qureshy, H., Caroline, K., & Lai, E. C. (2005). Gait and step training to reduce falls in Parkinson's disease. NeuroRehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.3233/nre-2005-20305

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.