Cited by 12Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchMedical Practices and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Symptoms of subordinated importance in fibromyalgia when differentiating working from non-working women

Open access
Liedberg and, G.M., Björk, M.·2014·Work

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim was to identify differences in self-reported symptoms among working (W) and non-working (NW) women, and to determine the most important biopsychosocial variables in differentiating one group from the other. METHOD: A questionnaire was mailed to 524 members of a local chapter of the Swedish Rheumatology Association. A total of 362 persons responded (69%); 96% of which were women. Women older than 64 years and all men were excluded. The final study group consisted of 95 W, and 227 NW women. The questionnaire included data on demographics, employment, support, exercise, daily activities and symptoms. Data were analysed using univariate statistics and a partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). RESULTS: The results showed that 41% of the W and 42% of the NW women were/had been employed in service,care or business. The NW women reported a significantly higher severity of symptoms compared with the W women. The most important variable when differentiating the W from the NW women was social support from colleagues and employers. CONCLUSION: To change prevailing attitudes and values towards persons with a work disability, a process of active intervention involving staff is needed. Educating employers as to how a disability may influence a work situation, and the importance of social support, can be improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-131607

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liedberg and, G. M., & Björk, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • Jönköping University (SE)
Venue
Work
Published
2014
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
155-164
ISSN
1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1515450483
Cited by
12
References
31
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
fibromyalgia, women's employment, non-working women, symptom severity, social support, employment, work disability, biopsychosocial factors, employer support
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Employment, Female, Fibromyalgia, Persons with Disabilities, Headache, Humans, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Pain, Pain Measurement, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Social Support, Exercise, Workplace, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review