Cited by 13Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersAgriculture and Farm SafetyOccupational Health and Safety in Workplaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ergonomic workplace evaluation and epidemiology of musculoskeletal discomfort on German dairy farms

Thinius, Maxi, Jakob, Martina·2014·WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation

Abstract

Previous European studies have shown a high prevalence of musculoskeletal discomfort (MSD) among milking parlor operatives, affecting at least 70% of the staff. The aim of the project was to find correlations between workplace design and prevalence of MSD. For this a data collection was carried out questioning the parlor operatives using a modified Nordic Questionnaire. On farm parlor specifics and bovimetrics of milked cows of a randomly-selected shift were measured. After that data was combined to compare the workplace design and the occurrence of MSD. The results showed that 94% of the female and 71% of the male workers suffered from MSD. The work place analysis revealed that women regularly worked above shoulder level and had to tort and bend more often than men because of the gender specific anthropometrics and the workplace design. The survey took into consideration that not only milking is considered strenuous but other farm tasks as well. The results also demonstrated that there is a need to take action to improve modern milking parlors. The existing helping devices are not sufficient to reduce the workload; reorganizing the work tasks, work schedule and the work place design is suggested.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-131765

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thinius, M., & Jakob, M.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Leibniz Institute for Agricultural Engineering and Bioeconomy (DE)
Corresponding author
Jakob, Martina
Venue
WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation
Published
2014-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
25-32
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W1755952730
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Agriculture and Farm Safety
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
Keywords
musculoskeletal disorders, dairy workers, milking parlor, workplace design, human factors, anthropometry, sex differences, Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, workload, work schedules
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Animals, Cattle, Dairying, Female, Germany, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Posture, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Prevalence, Workload, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review