Cited by 26Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersOccupational Health and Safety in WorkplacesOccupational Health and Safety Management

Ergonomic intervention on a packing workstation with robotic aid –case study at a furniture manufacturing industry

Open access
Colim, Ana, Sousa, Nuno, Carneiro, Paula, Costa, Nélson, Arezes, Pedro, Cardoso, André·2020·Work

Abstract

Background Several risk factors among packing lines workers can lead to Work-related Musculoskeletal Disorders (WRMSD) occurrence. Foreseeing WRMSD prevention and productivity increase, some furniture manufacturing industries have been investing in the adoption of robotic solutions. In this field, ergonomics plays an important role to verify if automation implementation has been successful. Objective This study aims to address the general impact and effectiveness from an ergonomics point of view of the implementation of a robotic aid in a packing workstation. Methods The Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ) was applied to 14 workers of semi-automated packing lines. Some additional questions about occupational conditions were included. In order to assess the ergonomic impact of the robotic aid, Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) was also applied by trained ergonomists, by analyzing the considered packing workstations before and after the adoption of the robotic aid proposed solution. Results The results showed that trunk torsion was the most highlighted WRMSD risk factor by all workers, associating it with the lumbar pain. The obtained RULA scores demonstrated that the adoption of a robotic aid eliminated this risk factor and, consequently, reduced the corresponding WRMSD risk. Conclusions The adoption of robotic aids can be instrumental in reducing WRMSD risk in furniture manufacturing industries. Ergonomic studies with workers' participatory approaches seem to be an ap…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/wor-203144

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Applying the RULA method combined with self-reported musculoskeletal symptomatology questionnaires contributes importantly to the risk assessment of musculoskeletal disorders in jobs with manufacturing and repetitive tasks.

    “The application of the RULA method, combined with self-reported musculoskeletal symptomatology questionnaires, has also shown an important contribution to the risk assessment of musculoskeletal disorders in jobs with manufacturing and repetitive type tasks”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colim, A., Sousa, N., Carneiro, P., Costa, N., Arezes, P., & Cardoso, A.
Affiliations
University of Minho (PT)
Venue
Work
Published
2020-06-04
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
229-237
ISSN
  • 1051-9815 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-9270
OpenAlex
W3024810185
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Work (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety Management
Keywords
work-related musculoskeletal disorders, robotic assistance, furniture industry, ergonomic interventions, trunk torsion, low back pain, Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, RULA, occupational risk factors, industrial automation
MeSH terms
Adult, Back Pain, Female, Humans, Ergonomics, Interior Design and Furnishings, Middle Aged, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Occupational Diseases, Surveys and Questionnaires, Robotics, Manufacturing Industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review