Cited by 9Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferencePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

La aplicación de modelos lineales jerárquicos para el estudio de la eficacia en psicoterapia

Open access
Gómez Penedo, Juan Martín, Muiños, Roberto, Hirsch, Pablo, Roussos, Andrés·2019·Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento

Abstract

Hierarchical Linear Models (HLM) represents a valuable statistical tool for psychotherapy research, given that they allow dealing with the usual dependency presented in its data. These methods are useful to estimate change, disaggregate sources of variations, and analyze the effect of different level predictors. Considering that, these analyses required a highly sophisticated technical knowledge that might remain inaccessible for many researchers, the aim of this paper is to present a guide on how to understand, apply, and report HLM for psychotherapy effects research. To illustrate how to apply HLM, we have drawn on a naturalistic clinical dataset. Disseminating these methods in the Latin-America might represent a meaningful contribution both for research and practice, improving the soundness of clinical studies and helping to develop a more robust knowledge that might leads to greater process and outcome in psychotherapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32348/1852.4206.v11.n1.20412

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In cases in which ANOVAs or ordinary least squares models were used instead of hierarchical models, the results should be interpreted with more caution because they do not account for the dependency of the data.

    “Indeed, in cases in which ANOVAs or ordinary least squares models were used instead of hierarchical models, the results should be interpreted with more caution. They do not account for the dependency of the data, and in longitudinal assessments such as AA in which data are essentially nested, using these strategies may yield inaccurate pictures of the data [114].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Etchebarne, I., O'Connell, M., & Roussos, A. (2008). Estudio de mediadores y moderadores en la investigación en Psicoterapia. Anuario de Investigaciones, 13(1), 33-56.
  2. Gómez Penedo, J. M., Constantino, M. J., Coyne, A., Bernecker, S. L., & Lotte Smith-Hansen, L. (2018). Patient Baseline Interpersonal Problems as Moderators of Outcome in Two Psychotherapies for Bulimia Nervosa. Psychotherapy Research. Publicación anticipada en línea. doi: 10.1080/1050337.2018.1425931 · DOI
  3. Ogles, B. M. (2013). Measuring change in psychotherapy research. En M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfields's Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change (pp.134- 166). New Jersey: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gómez Penedo, J. M., Muiños, R., Hirsch, P., & Roussos, A.
Affiliations
  • National University of Tres de Febrero (AR)
  • University of San Andrés (AR)
Venue
Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento
Published
2019-04-24
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
25-37
ISSN
1852-4206 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2947817406
Cited by
9
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
es
Open access
Locations
  • Revista Argentina de Ciencias del Comportamiento ( RACC ) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greater South Information System
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
multilevel analysis, psychotherapy effectiveness, psychotherapy outcome research, Latin America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review