Cited by 9Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Effectiveness of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Resiliency and Alexithymia of Somatic Symptoms

Open access
Rostami, Raha, Dasht Bozorgi, Zahra·2019·Practice in Clinical Psychology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32598/jpcp.7.2.87

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rostami, R., & Dasht Bozorgi, Z.
Affiliations
Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz Branch (IR)
Venue
Practice in Clinical Psychology
Published
2019-06-30
Pages
87-94
ISSN
2423-5822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2949673368
Cited by
9
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Practice in Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
acceptance and commitment therapy, resilience, alexithymia, somatic symptoms, treatment effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review