The DOI matches its Crossref record.
stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables
Open accessAbstract
Produces LaTeX code, HTML/CSS code and ASCII text for well-formatted tables that hold regression analysis results from several models side-by-side, as well as summary statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Huckins, J. F., daSilva, A. W., Wang, W., Hedlund, E., Rogers, C., Nepal, S. K., Wu, J., Obuchi, M., Murphy, E. I., Meyer, M. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20185 · Cited by 759
Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions
Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y · Cited by 74
Vazquez, J. M., & Lynch, V. J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.65041 · Cited by 61
Upzoning and Single-Family Housing Prices: A (Very) Early Analysis of the Minneapolis 2040 Plan
Kuhlmann, D. (2021) · Journal of the American Planning Association · doi:10.1080/01944363.2020.1852101 · Cited by 46
Ong, C. W., Woods, D. W., Franklin, M. E., Saunders, S. M., Neal-Barnett, A. M., Compton, S. N., & Twohig, M. P. (2023) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2023.104302 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- <marek.hlavac@gmail.com>, M. H.
- Venue
- CRAN: Contributed Packages
- Publisher
- The R Foundation
- Published
- 2012-10-02
- OpenAlex
- W4399581870
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- Type
- dataset
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.32614/cran.package.stargazer
- The paper
- <marek.hlavac@gmail.com>, M. H. (2012). stargazer: Well-Formatted Regression and Summary Statistics Tables. CRAN: Contributed Packages. https://doi.org/10.32614/cran.package.stargazer
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
