Cited by 133Data Analysis with RStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods and Applications

Resampling-Based Analysis of Multivariate Data and Repeated Measures Designs with the R Package MANOVA.RM

Open access
Friedrich, Sarah, Konietschke, Frank, Pauly, Markus·2019·The R Journal

Abstract

Nonparametric statistical inference methods for a modern and robust analysis of longitudinal and multivariate data in factorial experiments are essential for research.While existing approaches that rely on specific distributional assumptions of the data (multivariate normality and/or equal covariance matrices) are implemented in statistical software packages, there is a need for user-friendly software that can be used for the analysis of data that do not fulfill the aforementioned assumptions and provide accurate p value and confidence interval estimates.Therefore, newly developed nonparametric statistical methods based on bootstrap-and permutation-approaches, which neither assume multivariate normality nor specific covariance matrices, have been implemented in the freely available R package MANOVA.RM.The package is equipped with a graphical user interface for plausible applications in academia and other educational purpose.Several motivating examples illustrate the application of the methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32614/rj-2019-051

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The nonparametric RM-MANOVA does not rely on assumptions of multivariate normality or specific covariance structures, making it suitable even for data with non-normal error terms and/or heteroscedastic variances.

    “This analysis does not rely on assumptions of multivariate normality or specific covariance structures in the data, making it suitable even for data with non‐normal error terms and/or heteroscedastic variances [58, 59].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F., & Pauly, M.
Affiliations
TU Dortmund University (DE)
Venue
The R Journal
Published
2019
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
380
ISSN
2073-4859 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998668315
Cited by
131
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 13 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • The R Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • GoeScholar The Publication Server of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG‐PA 2409/3‐1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Data Analysis with R
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
repeated measures designs, longitudinal data, bootstrapping, permutation tests, multivariate normality, covariance structure, R package, graphical user interface, confidence intervals, p-value estimation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review