The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Text Summarization using Extractive and Abstractive Techniques
Open accessAbstract
There have been considerable advancements in Text Summarization over the last few years. There are two ways to text summarization: one is based on natural language processing (NLP), and the other is based on deep learning. In the realm of NLP, text summarization is the most intriguing and challenging task. NLP stands for Natural Language Processing, which studies and manipulates human language by computers. Because of the massive increase in information and data, it has become critical. Text summarization is creating a thorough and meaningful summary of text from various sources such as books, news stories, research papers, and tweets, among others. Large text documents that are difficult to summarize manually are the research subject. The job of condensing a piece of text into a shorter version, minimizing the size of the original text while maintaining key informative components and content meaning, is known as summarising. Because human text summarising is a time-consuming and intrinsically tiresome process, automating it is gaining popularity and hence acts as a potent stimulus for academic study.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It employs an abstractive summarisation technique (Shah and Phadnis 2022), where the summary is formed by generating new sentences that encapsulate the core information of the original text.”
From Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Shah and Phadnis 2022
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, Peter J. Liu., “Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer” · DOI
- Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, Veselin Stoyanov. It is based on Google’s BERT model released in 2018,”RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach” · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Artificial intelligence for literature reviews: opportunities and challenges
Bolaños, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2024) · Artificial Intelligence Review · doi:10.1007/s10462-024-10902-3 · Cited by 246
Metadata
- Authors
- Shah, C. A., & Phadnis, P. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Mumbai (IN)
- Department of Computer Engineering, SLRCTE, University of Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
- Venue
- International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology
- Publisher
- Technoscience Academy
- Published
- 2022-05-10
- Pages
- 236-241
- ISSN
- 2456-3307 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4283835139
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 0.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- text summarization, extractive summarization, abstractive summarization, natural language processing, deep learning, information condensation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Text Summarization using Extractive and Abstractive Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.32628/cseit228361
- The paper
- Shah, C. A., & Phadnis, P. N. (2022). Text Summarization using Extractive and Abstractive Techniques. International Journal of Scientific Research in Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.32628/cseit228361