The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Study on the Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Information Transparency
Open accessAbstract
This study explores the impact of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) performance on corporate information transparency. The research found that companies with excellent ESG performance excel in the comprehensiveness, consistency, and accuracy of information disclosure, which directly enhances their market reputation and investor confidence. By analyzing internationally recognized ESG evaluation standards and corporate case studies, this paper confirms a significant positive correlation between high ESG scores and high transparency. Additionally, the study points out that although companies face various challenges in improving transparency, such as high costs and inconsistent standards, they can effectively enhance their information transparency by adopting standardized ESG reporting frameworks, leveraging advanced technologies, and strengthening internal and external oversight mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In this context, ESG integration improves more comprehensive, consistent, and accurate disclosure of information, which directly enhances corporate transparency, market reputation, and investor confidence, yet it simultaneously increases the risk of symbolic adoption and greenwashing when sustainability commitments are decoupled from substantive organizational change [19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Decision-Making for Sustainable Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“In this context, ESG integration improves more comprehensive, consistent, and accurate disclosure of information, which directly enhances corporate transparency, market reputation, and investor confidence, yet it simultaneously increases the risk of symbolic adoption and greenwashing when sustainability commitments are decoupled from substantive organizational change [19,20].”
From Artificial Intelligence in Managerial Decision-Making for Sustainable Business Models: A Systematic Literature Review (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Sun Hui, Zhu Shusen, Zhang Xianfeng. ESG Performance, Corporate Transparency, and Corporate Reputation [J]. Soft Science, 2023, 37(12): 115-121.
- Jiang Wei. Corporate ESG Performance, Information Transparency, and Financial Performance [J]. Finance, 2024, 14(3): 13.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Urbanovič, M., & Holubčík, M. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14030245 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Qin, Z.
- Affiliations
- China University of Petroleum, East China (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Qin, Zixuan
- ORCID
- Qin, Zixuan
- Venue
- Modern Economics & Management Forum
- Published
- 2024-10-24
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 777
- ISSN
- 2717-6045 (ISSN-L)
- 2717-6053
- OpenAlex
- W4404141484
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- FWCI
- 0.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Modern Economics & Management Forum (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Financial Reporting and XBRL
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Governance, Compliance, and Sustainability
- Keywords
- ESG performance, information disclosure, market reputation, investor confidence, corporate governance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Study on the Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Information Transparency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.32629/memf.v5i5.2608
- The paper
- Qin, Z. (2024). Study on the Impact of ESG Performance on Corporate Information Transparency. Modern Economics & Management Forum. https://doi.org/10.32629/memf.v5i5.2608
