CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24Academic integrity and plagiarismDiscourse Analysis in Language StudiesLegal Issues in Education

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Institutional Three-Stage Framework: Elevating Academic Writing and Integrity Standards of International Pathway Students

Open access
Velliaris, Donna M., Breen, Paul·2016·Journal of International Students
DOI 10.32674/jis.v6i2.371
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this paper, the authors explore a holistic three-stage framework currently used by the Eynesbury Institute of Business and Technology (EIBT), focused on academic staff identification and remediation processes for the prevention of (un)intentional student plagiarism. As a pre-university pathway provider—whose student-body is 98% “international”—plagiarism is a prevalent and complex issue that cannot be solved with a single-solution response. The three-stages of identification should be conceived holistically and with each stage being equally important to the assessment of student writing. It is worth noting, however, that the extent to which plagiarism is detected will determine the number of stages involved and the degree the student has transgressed. This framework emphasizes the need for, and importance of, Academic Integrity (AI), literary ownership, assessment transparency, and compatibility with partner institutions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32674/jis.v6i2.371

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Abdul-Ameer, M. A., & Hussein, K. S. (2015). Plagiarism and patchwriting detection in EFL students' graduation research writing. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(8), 128-136.
  2. Batane, T. (2010). Turning to Turnitin to fight plagiarism among university students. Educational Technology & Society, 13(2), 1-12.
  3. Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing and delivering e-learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
  4. Berry, P., Thornton, B., & Baker, R. (2006). Demographics of digital cheating: Who cheats, and what we can do about it. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the Southern Association for Information Systems.
  5. Bonk, C. J. (2010). How technology is changing school. Educational Leadership, 67(7), 60-65.
  6. Bosher, S. (2003). Addressing cultural and linguistic diversity in the classroom: Becoming culturally competent. The Minnesota and Wisconsin Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (The MinneTESOL/WITESOL) Journal, 20, 55-73.
  7. Bretag, T., & Green, M. (2009, 28-30 September). Determining outcomes for academic misconduct: Is it more important to be consistent or fair? Paper presented at the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity (4APCEI), University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  8. Bretag, T., & Mahmud, S. (2009). A model for determining student plagiarism: Electronic detection and academic judgement. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 6(1), 49- 60.
  9. Cantell, R. H., Scevak, J. J., & Parkes, R. J. (2010). Aligning intellectual development curriculum, instruction and assessment. In R. H. Cantwell & J. J. Scevak (Eds.), An Academic Life (pp. 16-24). Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.
  10. Culwin, F., & Lancaster, T. (2001). Plagiarism issues for higher education. Vine, 31(2), 36-41.
  11. Dahl, S. (2007). Turnitin® The student perspective on using plagiarism detection software. Active Learning in Higher Education, 8(2), 173-191.
  12. Embleton, K., & Helfer, D. (2007). The plague of plagiarism and academic dishonesty. Searcher, 15(6), 23-26.
  13. Gannon-Leary, P., Trayhurn, D., & Home, M. (2009). Good images, effective messages? Working with students and educators on academic practice understanding. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(4), 435-448.
  14. Gilbert, J. (2013). English for academic purposes. In G. Motteram (Ed.), Innovations in learning technologies for English language teaching. London: British Council.
  15. Gilquin, G., Granger, S., & Paquot, M. (2007). Learner corpora: The missing link in EAP pedagogy. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(4), 1-25.
  16. Goddard, R., & Rudzki, R. (2005). Using an electronic text-matching tool (Turnitin) to detect plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 2(3), (Article 7) 58-63.
  17. Horovitz, S. J. (2008). Two wrongs don't negate a copyright: Don't make students Turnitin if you won't give it back. Florida Law Review 229, 60(1), 229-275.
  18. Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.
  19. Jones, M. (2009). Back-translation: The latest form of plagiarism. Paper presented at the The 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
  20. Keuskamp, D., & Sliuzas, R. (2007). Plagiarism prevention or detection? The contribution of textmatching software to education about academic integrity. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 1(1), A91-A99.
  21. Kisamore, J. L., Stone, T. H., & Jawahar, I. M. (2007). Academic integrity: The relationship between individual and situational factors on misconduct contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 381-394.
  22. Lea, M. R., & Jones, S. (2011). Digital literacies in higher education: Exploring textual and technological practice. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 377-393.
  23. Lund, J. R. (2004). Plagiarism: A cultural perspective. Journal of Religious & Theological Information, 6(3/4), 93-101.
  24. Mahmood, Z. (2009). Students' understandings of plagiarism and collusion and recommendations for academics. WSEAS Transactions on Information Science and Applications, 8(6), 1348-1358.
  25. Martirosyan, N. M., Hwang, E., & Wanjohi, R. (2015). Impact of English proficiency on academic performance of international students. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 60-71.
  26. McCabe, D. L. (2005a). Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 1(1).
  27. McCabe, D. L. (2005b). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty and educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91(3), 26-31.
  28. McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2006). Academic dishonesty in graduate business programs: Prevalence, causes, and proposed action. Academy of Management, Learning and Education, 5(3), 294-305.
  29. McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 36(3), 10-15.
  30. McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1995). Cheating among business students: A challenge for business leaders and educators. Journal of Management Education, 19(2), 205-218.
  31. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 219-232.
  32. McGowan, U. (2005a). Academic integrity: An awareness and development issue for students and staff. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice (JUTLP), 2(3), 6.
  33. McGowan, U. (2005b). Plagiarism detection and prevention: Are we putting the cart before the horse. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the HERDSA conference.
  34. Moore, T., & Morton, J. (2005). Dimensions of difference: A comparison of university writing and IELTS writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(1), 43-66.
  35. Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91-108.
  36. Neville, C. (2010). The complete guide to referencing and avoiding plagiarism. UK: McGraw-Hill Education.
  37. Paquot, M. (2008). Exemplification in learner writing: A cross- linguistic perspective. In F. Meunier & S. Granger (Eds.), Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching (pp. 101-119). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  38. Park, C. (2003). In other (people's) words: Plagiarism by university students -literature and lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(5), 471-488.
  39. Park, C. (2004). Rebels without a clause: Towards an institutional framework for dealing with plagiarism by students. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28(3), 291-306.
  40. Pecorari, D. (2003). Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 317-345.
  41. Russikoff, K., Fucaloro, L., & Salkauskiene, D. (2003). Plagiarism as a cross-cultural phenomenon. The CATESOL Journal, 15(1), 127-142.
  42. Savage, S. (2004). Staff and student responses to a trial of Turnitin plagiarism detection software. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Australian Universities Quality Forum.
  43. Sawir, E. (2005). Language difficulties of international students in Australia: The effects of prior learning experience. International Education Journal, 6(5), 567-580.
  44. Singh, M. K. M. (2015). International graduate students' academic writing practices in Malaysia: Challenges and solutions. Journal of International Students, 5(1), 12-22.
  45. Stapleton, P. (2010). Writing in an electronic age: A case study of L2 composing processes. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4), 295-307.
  46. Stratilas, K. (2011). The evolving nature of support: A new horizon. Journal of Academic Language & Learning, 5(2), A44-A49.
  47. Šupak Smolčić, V., & Bilić-Zulle, L. (2013). Patchwork plagiarism: A jigsaw of stolen puzzle pieces. Biochemia Medica, 23(1), 16- 18.
  48. Velliaris, D. M., & Warner, R. (2009, 1-4 December). Embedding 'learning guides' in a flexible delivery mode: Improving academic acculturation for international students at an Australian university. Paper presented at the 20th ISANA International Education Conference, Hotel Realm, Canberra, Australia.
  49. Velliaris, D. M., & Willis, C. R. (2014). Getting personal: An autoethnographic study of the professional identit(ies) of lecturers in an Australian pathway institution. In P. Breen (Ed.), Cases on teacher identity, diversity, and cognition in higher education (pp. 87-110). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  50. Velliaris, D. M., Willis, C. R., & Breen, P. (2015a). Academic reflections: Disciplinary acculturation and the first year pathway experience. In P. N. Shrestha (Ed.), Current developments in English for academic and specific purposes: Local innovations and global perspectives (pp. 217-235). Reading, UK: Garnet Publishing Ltd.
  51. Velliaris, D. M., Willis, C. R., & Breen, P. (2015b). Reflections on the impact of social technologies on lecturers in a pathway institution. In V. Benson & S. Morgan (Eds.), Implications of

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Velliaris, D. M., & Breen, P.
Affiliations
University of Westminster (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of International Students
Publisher
STAR Scholars Network
Published
2016-04-01
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
565-587
ISSN
  • 2162-3104 (ISSN-L)
  • 2166-3750
DOI
10.32674/jis.v6i2.371
OpenAlex
W2521514548
Cited by
24
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of International Students (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Academic integrity and plagiarism
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
  • Social Sciences › Law › Legal Issues in Education
Keywords
plagiarism avoidance, academic integrity, international students, academic writing, plagiarism detection, remediation, assessment transparency, copyright, institutional partnerships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review