Cited by 34BIM and Construction IntegrationQuality and Supply ManagementConstruction Project Management and Performance

Improving Formwork Engineering Using the Toyota Way

Open access
Department of Civil Engineering, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology, Ko, Chien-Ho, Wang, Wei-Chieh, Kuo, Jiun-De·2011·Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management

Abstract

Construction is a labor-intensive industry with formwork engineering requiring a disproportionate amount of labor and costs. Formwork accounts for approximately one-third of the cost of reinforced concrete construction, partly because traditional formwork processes frequently result in delivery delays and material waste. The purpose of this research is to adapt production concepts pioneered by Toyota (the “Toyota Way”) to improve formwork engineering. The Toyota Way of production consists of four tiers of management philosophy, known as the “4Ps” model. This research adopts the 4Ps as steps for formwork improvement. The first step, “establishing long term vision,” emphasizes long term considerations for formwork improvement. Step two, “establishing value streams,” reviews formwork flows and eliminates wastage. The third step, “developing the crew,” forms mold workers as a team. The final step is “developing a culture of continuous improvement” that provides a basis for constant review and provides a basis for continuous progress. The present research used the Toyota Way to improve formwork engineering. The improvements include reductions in resource waste and increases in operational value. In the long run, the proposed model could provide a learning and growth platform for individuals, the business unit, and the company’s extended network of partners. It could also serve to spur innovative thinking in the improvement of formwork engineering.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32738/jeppm.201107.0003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Formwork is the predominant expenditure in reinforced concrete construction, comprising up to 60% of the unit cost of the RC structure and as much as 15% of total construction costs.

    “Formwork constitutes the predominant expenditure in reinforced concrete (RC) construction, possibly comprising up to 60% of the unit cost of the RC structure and accounting for as much as 15% of the total construction costs [2,3].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Department of Civil Engineering, N. P. U. O. S. A. T., Ko, C.-H., Wang, W.-C., & Kuo, J.-D.
Affiliations
National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (TW)
Venue
Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management
Published
2011-07-31
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
13-27
ISSN
  • 2221-6529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2223-8379
OpenAlex
W69033660
Cited by
34
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
Keywords
Toyota Way, lean construction, value stream mapping, waste elimination, continuous improvement, reinforced concrete construction, construction cost reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review