Improving Formwork Engineering Using the Toyota Way
Open accessAbstract
Construction is a labor-intensive industry with formwork engineering requiring a disproportionate amount of labor and costs. Formwork accounts for approximately one-third of the cost of reinforced concrete construction, partly because traditional formwork processes frequently result in delivery delays and material waste. The purpose of this research is to adapt production concepts pioneered by Toyota (the “Toyota Way”) to improve formwork engineering. The Toyota Way of production consists of four tiers of management philosophy, known as the “4Ps” model. This research adopts the 4Ps as steps for formwork improvement. The first step, “establishing long term vision,” emphasizes long term considerations for formwork improvement. Step two, “establishing value streams,” reviews formwork flows and eliminates wastage. The third step, “developing the crew,” forms mold workers as a team. The final step is “developing a culture of continuous improvement” that provides a basis for constant review and provides a basis for continuous progress. The present research used the Toyota Way to improve formwork engineering. The improvements include reductions in resource waste and increases in operational value. In the long run, the proposed model could provide a learning and growth platform for individuals, the business unit, and the company’s extended network of partners. It could also serve to spur innovative thinking in the improvement of formwork engineering.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formwork is the predominant expenditure in reinforced concrete construction, comprising up to 60% of the unit cost of the RC structure and as much as 15% of total construction costs.
“Formwork constitutes the predominant expenditure in reinforced concrete (RC) construction, possibly comprising up to 60% of the unit cost of the RC structure and accounting for as much as 15% of the total construction costs [2,3].”
From Assessment of Sustainable Hybrid Formwork Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment and the Wear-Out Coefficient—A Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Baskaran, D., Chockkalingam, U., & Senthil Muthalvan, R. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15101630 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Department of Civil Engineering, N. P. U. O. S. A. T., Ko, C.-H., Wang, W.-C., & Kuo, J.-D.
- Affiliations
- National Pingtung University of Science and Technology (TW)
- ORCID
- Ko, Chien-Ho
- Venue
- Journal of Engineering, Project, and Production Management
- Published
- 2011-07-31
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 13-27
- ISSN
- 2221-6529 (ISSN-L)
- 2223-8379
- OpenAlex
- W69033660
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Journal of Engineering Project and Production Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Keywords
- Toyota Way, lean construction, value stream mapping, waste elimination, continuous improvement, reinforced concrete construction, construction cost reduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review