Cited by 44Rural development and sustainabilityRegional Socio-Economic Development TrendsEducation in Rural Contexts

Rural America at a glance

Davis, James C., Cromartie, John, Farrigan, Tracey, Genetin, Brandon, Sanders, Austin, Winikoff, Justin B., United StatesDepartment of AgricultureEconomic Research Service·2023

Abstract

The U.S. rural population is growing again after a decade of overall population loss, with growth of approximately a quarter percent from 2020 to 2022. This growth occurred because rural in-migration was larger than declines in the natural rate (the number of births compared with the number of deaths) of population growth. The rural population is also experiencing declines in poverty. In 2021, 9.7 percent fewer nonmetropolitan counties experienced persistent poverty (20 percent or more of the population had poverty level household incomes in each of the last four decennial Census years) compared with a decade earlier. Still, more than half of extremely low-income nonmetropolitan renter households experienced housing insecurity. This issue was particularly acute for American Indian or Alaska Native and Hispanic households. This report examines recent issues such as rural population and migration trends, poverty, housing insecurity, employment, and clean energy jobs. The report finds that rural employment levels and annual growth rates nearly returned to those seen in the years prior to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Finally, highlighting an emerging employment area of interest, approximately 1 percent of nonmetropolitan workers hold clean energy jobs

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32747/2023.8134362.ers

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the included literature, regions with fewer documented pathway programs, such as parts of the Midwest and the South, coincide with states characterized by higher proportions of immigrant, English language learners, rural, and economically disadvantaged populations.

    “In the included literature, regions with fewer documented pathway programs, such as parts of the Midwest and the South, also coincide with states characterized by higher proportions of immigrant, English language learners (ELL), rural, and economically disadvantaged populations (Davis et al., 2023;Farrigan & Sanders, 2024).”

Cited by

Authors
Davis, J. C., Cromartie, J., Farrigan, T., Genetin, B., Sanders, A., Winikoff, J. B., & Service, U. S. O. A. R.
Published
2023-11
OpenAlex
W4389762616
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Rural development and sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Regional Socio-Economic Development Trends
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education in Rural Contexts
Keywords
rural population growth, rural in-migration, natural population decline, poverty persistence, nonmetropolitan counties, housing insecurity, renter households, Latino families, rural employment, clean energy jobs, COVID-19 pandemic impact, rural America

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review