Through the lens of justice. A systematic review on equity and fairness in learning assessment
Open accessAbstract
Empirical and theoretical studies have highlighted the need to investigate the implications of the introduction of the issue of justice in education. However, little is known about the specific field of learning assessment and about the possible enhancement for assessment processes when inspired by discourses about justice, equity and fairness. What does it mean to rethink assessment through the lens of justice? The present paper aims to uncover key information related to this issue with the aim to provide greater understanding about how to build more equitable assessment practices. The PRISMA guidelines were adopted. Internet-based bibliographic searches were conducted via 2 major electronic databases (ERIC and Education Source) to access studies examining the association between the issues of justice, fairness and equity in assessment. A total of 26 empirical studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The studies reported the attention to both well as a focus on addressing diversity in the classroom moving away from a model of adjustments and reasonable accommodations towards an equitable and universal assessment. Additional research is important to clarify these issues and an important effort should be made to construct better assessment practices based on students and teachers' perceptions of justice.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Formative assessment allows for personalized support, addressing diverse learning needs and helping to close achievement gaps.
“Additionally, it allows for personalized support, addressing diverse learning needs and helping to close achievement gaps [61][62][63].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [61]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189
Lipnevich, A. A., Mattern, K., & Feddock, C. (2026) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2025.2569623 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aquario, D.
- Corresponding author
- Aquario, Debora
- Venue
- EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY
- Publisher
- Franco Angeli
- Published
- 2021-12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 96-110
- ISSN
- 2038-9442 (ISSN-L)
- 2284-015X
- OpenAlex
- W4206978823
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- EDUCATION SCIENCES AND SOCIETY (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Keywords
- social justice education, assessment fairness, learning assessment, assessment practices, reasonable accommodation, classroom diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review