The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Magnetite nanoparticles for reduction of hexavalent chrome in soil of an industrial park, Cerro Colorado - Arequipa [Nanopartículas de magnetita para reducción de cromo hexavalente en suelo de un parque industrial, Cerro Colorado – Arequipa]
Abstract
One of the most important contamination problems in receiving bodies due to industrial activities is the presence of chromium (VI). One way to reduce the aggressiveness of said contaminant is its reduction to the form of chromium (III). The investigation determined the efficiency of magnetite nanoparticles in the treatment of soil contaminating with chromium (VI), to reduce it to chromium (III) of an Industrial Park at the district Cerro Colorado, province and department of Arequipa.22 samples of 1 kg of soil were taken, then homogenized according to the extraction distances, considering at the end only 3 samples called “Shore”, “6 Meters” and “9 Meters”, whose concentrations were: 146 mg / kg, 126 mg / kg and 67 mg / kg of Cr (VI) respectively. These samples were subjected to 3 treatments (T1, T2 and T3) with 3 repetitions each using 15, 30 and 45 grams doses of Magnetite nanoparticles for three weeks. At the end of the treatment using the EPA 3060 method, the Chrome (VI) analysis was performed. The 3 treatments “T1”, “T2” and “T3”, had significant differences for the final concentrations of Hexavalent Chromium in the soil; but it was in Treatment 3 in the soil samples "Shore", "6 Meters" and "9 Meters", where a greater effect was achieved in the reduction of Cr (VI) to Chromium (III) with an efficiency of 99.96%, 99.93% and 99.93% respectively, 45 grams of magnetite nanoparticles were used for this treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Treatment with magnetite nanoparticles achieved below detection (BD) removal of Cr(VI) at pH not reported, 3 weeks [100].
“| Cr(VI) | Magnetite nanoparticles | BD | NA | NA | 3 weeks | [100] |”
From Chromium Remediation from Tannery Wastewater in Arequipa, Peru: Local Experiences and Prospects for Sustainable Solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
The Abstract reports that magnetite nanoparticles reduced Cr(VI) in soil over three weeks. It reports efficiencies of 99.93–99.96% for the most effective treatment, but does not say the final Cr(VI) concentrations were below detection; that part of the table entry is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredParticular highlights for Cr removal included solar distillation, magnetic iron nanoparticles, artificial wetlands, iron-based coagulation-incorporating polymers, and infiltration systems.
“Particular highlights for Cr removal included solar distillation [99], magnetic iron nanoparticles [100], artificial wetlands [101], iron-based coagulation-incorporating polymers [102], and infiltration systems [30,103,104].”
From Chromium Remediation from Tannery Wastewater in Arequipa, Peru: Local Experiences and Prospects for Sustainable Solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
Nanotechnology is a common method used to treat Cr from wastewater, but only two studies used this technique in Arequipa.
“Nanotechnology, for example, is a common method used to treat Cr from wastewater [113,117,118], but only two studies [100,110] used this technique in Arequipa.”
From Chromium Remediation from Tannery Wastewater in Arequipa, Peru: Local Experiences and Prospects for Sustainable Solutions (2025) · cites this paper as [100]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Carrillo, Rogelio y González, Carmen. La Nanotecnología en la agricultura rehabilitación de suelos contaminados. Revista Interdisciplinaria en Nanociencia y Nanotecnología, Vol. 2 (2). 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2009.2.53587 · DOI
- Sierra C., Martínez D., Blanco J. y Gallego J. Optimización de la separación magnética: un estudio de caso para el lavado del suelo en un sitio contaminado con metales pesados. Quimiosfera, Volumen 107 , julio, 2014, páginas 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.063 · DOI
- Ruiz Marcelo, M. ., Cermeño Castromonte, C. ., & Benites Alfaro, E. . (2019). Magnetite nanoparticles for reduction of hexavalent chrome in soil of an industrial park, Cerro Colorado - Arequipa [Nanopartículas de magnetita para reducción de cromo hexavalente en suelo de un parque industrial, Cerro Colorado – Arequipa]. Journal of Nanotechnology, 3(1), 12–17. Retrieved from https://journals.cincader.org/index.php/nanoj/article/view/20
- Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): January - June
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Morales-Paredes, L. F., Garcia-Chevesich, P. A., Romero-Mariscal, G., Arenazas-Rodriguez, A., Ticona-Quea, J., Tejada-Purizaca, T. R., Vanzin, G., & Sharp, J. O. (2025) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su17031183 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ruiz Marcelo, M., Cermeño Castromonte, C., & Benites Alfaro, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Nanotechnology
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12
- ISSN
- 2522-6908
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review