Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Magnetite nanoparticles for reduction of hexavalent chrome in soil of an industrial park, Cerro Colorado - Arequipa [Nanopartículas de magnetita para reducción de cromo hexavalente en suelo de un parque industrial, Cerro Colorado – Arequipa]

Ruiz Marcelo, Mardelly, Cermeño Castromonte, Cecilia, Benites Alfaro, Elmer·2019·Journal of Nanotechnology

Abstract

One of the most important contamination problems in receiving bodies due to industrial activities is the presence of chromium (VI). One way to reduce the aggressiveness of said contaminant is its reduction to the form of chromium (III). The investigation determined the efficiency of magnetite nanoparticles in the treatment of soil contaminating with chromium (VI), to reduce it to chromium (III) of an Industrial Park at the district Cerro Colorado, province and department of Arequipa.22 samples of 1 kg of soil were taken, then homogenized according to the extraction distances, considering at the end only 3 samples called “Shore”, “6 Meters” and “9 Meters”, whose concentrations were: 146 mg / kg, 126 mg / kg and 67 mg / kg of Cr (VI) respectively. These samples were subjected to 3 treatments (T1, T2 and T3) with 3 repetitions each using 15, 30 and 45 grams doses of Magnetite nanoparticles for three weeks. At the end of the treatment using the EPA 3060 method, the Chrome (VI) analysis was performed. The 3 treatments “T1”, “T2” and “T3”, had significant differences for the final concentrations of Hexavalent Chromium in the soil; but it was in Treatment 3 in the soil samples "Shore", "6 Meters" and "9 Meters", where a greater effect was achieved in the reduction of Cr (VI) to Chromium (III) with an efficiency of 99.96%, 99.93% and 99.93% respectively, 45 grams of magnetite nanoparticles were used for this treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32829/nanoj.v3i1.101

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Carrillo, Rogelio y González, Carmen. La Nanotecnología en la agricultura rehabilitación de suelos contaminados. Revista Interdisciplinaria en Nanociencia y Nanotecnología, Vol. 2 (2). 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/ceiich.24485691e.2009.2.53587 · DOI
  2. Sierra C., Martínez D., Blanco J. y Gallego J. Optimización de la separación magnética: un estudio de caso para el lavado del suelo en un sitio contaminado con metales pesados. Quimiosfera, Volumen 107 , julio, 2014, páginas 290-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.12.063 · DOI
  3. Ruiz Marcelo, M. ., Cermeño Castromonte, C. ., & Benites Alfaro, E. . (2019). Magnetite nanoparticles for reduction of hexavalent chrome in soil of an industrial park, Cerro Colorado - Arequipa [Nanopartículas de magnetita para reducción de cromo hexavalente en suelo de un parque industrial, Cerro Colorado – Arequipa]. Journal of Nanotechnology, 3(1), 12–17. Retrieved from https://journals.cincader.org/index.php/nanoj/article/view/20
  4. Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): January - June

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ruiz Marcelo, M., Cermeño Castromonte, C., & Benites Alfaro, E.
Venue
Journal of Nanotechnology
Published
2019-12-06
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
12
ISSN
2522-6908
Cited by
0
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review