Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effect of Academic Self-Efficacy on Students’ Thesis Writing Resilience

Sasferi, Nuzmi·2022·Tarbawi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
DOI 10.32939/tarbawi.v18i1.1689
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The most crucial inventory of literacy skills for students is completing a final project in the form of a thesis. However, many students experience high levels of anxiety during the guidance process, due to worries about conducting difficult research and demands from parents, as well as finding problems that can be used as titles, understanding how to write scientific papers, finding references, and meeting supervisors. This leads to stress among students, who feel pressured and lack confidence in their abilities, which is an important phenomenon studied here. Therefore, this study aims to determine the influence of student self-efficacy factors on their ability to complete their thesis. This research is a form of correlation between student self-efficacy and the ability to write a thesis, and it involved 117 seventh-semester students of the Islamic Religious Education study program at one of the Islamic universities in Jambi, Indonesia. The study used a Thesis Writing Resilience questionnaire consisting of 43 items and an Academic Self-Efficacy questionnaire consisting of 35 items. The study found a strong correlation between self-efficacy and the ability to complete a thesis with a correlation coefficient of -0.8. Therefore, there is a strong influence of student self-efficacy on their ability to write a thesis. Self-efficacy can reduce or decrease student anxiety in preparing a thesis. This level of academic self-efficacy is more influenced by the level of individual resilience to their beliefs and individual ability to master a task. By improving student self-efficacy, students can feel more confident and less anxious in the thesis writing process. Therefore, universities and educators should develop interventions to improve student self-efficacy, such as providing guidance and support to help students develop the necessary skills to complete their thesis successfully. Additionally, future research should explore other factors that may influence student self-efficacy, such as family support, cultural backgrounds, and personal motivation, to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32939/tarbawi.v18i1.1689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Alfaiz, A., Zulfikar, Z., & Yulia, D. (2017). Efikasi diri sebagai faktor prediksi kesiapan mahasiswa dalam mengerjakan tugas kuliah. Ilmu Pendidikan: Jurnal Kajian Teori dan Praktik Kependidikan, 2(2), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v2i22017p119 Alwisol. (2010). Psikologi Kepribadian. UMM Press. · DOI
  2. Ghaleb, A. B., Ghaith, S., & Akour, M. (2015). Self-efficacy, achievement goals, and metacognition as predicators of academic motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2068-2073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.345 · DOI
  3. Jeniu, E., Widodo, D., & Widiani, E. (2017). Hubungan pengetahuan tentang autisme dengan tingkat kecemasan orangtua yang memiliki anak autisme di Sekolah Luar Biasa Bhakti Luhur Malang. Nursing News: Jurnal Ilmiah Keperawatan, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.33366/nn.v2i2.445 · DOI
  4. Jones, R. N. (2011). Teori dan Praktik Konseling dan Terapi (4 ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Kristanto, P. H., Pm, S., & Setyorini, S. (2014). Hubungan Antara Kepercayaan Diri Dengan Kecemasan Dalam Menyusun Proposal Skrips. Satya Widya. https://doi.org/10.24246/ j.sw.2014.v30.i1.p43- 48 · DOI
  6. Lightsey, R. (1999). Albert Bandura and the exercise of self-efficacy. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 13(2), 158. https://doi.org/0.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158
  7. Listanto, V., & Demak, I. P. K. (2015). Kecemasan pada mahasiswa angkatan 2010 yang mengerjakan tugas akhir program studi pendidikan dokter FKIK UNTAD tahun 2010. Medika Tadulako: Jurnal Ilmiah Kedokteran Fakultas Kedokteran dan Ilmu Kesehatan, 2(1), 40-49.
  8. Ormrod, J. E. (2008). Educational Psychology: Membantu Siswa Tumbuh dan Berkembang (2 ed.).
  9. Putra, A., & Roza, M. (2020). Systematic Literatur Review: Adversity Quotient dan Self Efficacy dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. At-Tarbawi: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 184- 201.
  10. Rau, M. J., Rahman, A., & Randalembah, G. R. (2017). Faktor Risiko Kejadian Gangguan Anxietas Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Ampana Kota Kabupaten Tojo Una-una Tahun 2016. Preventif: Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.53089/medula.v12i1.400 · DOI
  11. Raudatussalamah, V. S. (2014). Self-Efficacy dan Self-Regulation sebagai unsur penting dalam pendidikan karakter (Aplikasi pembelajaran mata kuliah akhlak tasawuf). Kutubkhanah, 17(2), 214-229. https://doi.org/10.24014/kutubkhanah.v17i2.818 · DOI
  12. Rustika, I. M. (2012). Efikasi diri: tinjauan teori Albert Bandura. Buletin psikologi, 20(1-2), 18-25. Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Vol. 18, No. 1, June 2022, 36-44 https://doi.org/10.22146/bpsi.11945 · DOI
  13. Safitri, D. P., & Masykur, A. M. (2017). Hubungan Efikasi Diri dengan Kecemasan Menghadapi Kejuaraan Nasionalpada Atlet Tenis Lapangan Pelti Semarang. Jurnal Empati, 6(2), 98-105.
  14. Saraswati, N., Dwidiyanti, M., Santoso, A., & Wijayanti, D. Y. (2021). Hubungan efikasi diri dengan kecemasan menyusun skripsi pada mahasiswa keperawatan. Holistic Nursing and Health Science, 4(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14710/hnhs.4.1.2021.1-7 · DOI
  15. Sari, A. R., & Satwika, Y. W. (2022). Hubungan Regulasi Diri Dengan Prokrastinasi Siswa Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Penelitian Psikologi, 9(1), 136-145.
  16. Sari, E. S., & Pujiono, S. (2017). Budaya Literasi di Kalangan Mahasiswa FBS UNY. Litera, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v16i1.14254 · DOI
  17. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspectives (6th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
  18. Tilson, G. P., & Hathaway, S. (2010). Learning to Achieve; A Review of the Research Literature on Employment Experiences and Outcomes for Youth and Adults With Learning Disabilities (J. M. Taymans (ed.)). National Institute for Literacy.
  19. Zhai, Y., & Du, X. (2020). Addressing collegiate mental health amid COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry research, 288, 113003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113003 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Sasferi, N.
Venue
Tarbawi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher
Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kerinci
Published
2022-06-08
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
36-44
ISSN
  • 2615-6547
  • 1858-1080
DOI
10.32939/tarbawi.v18i1.1689
Cited by
1
References
0
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 (unspecified)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.