Cited by 9Disability Education and EmploymentDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesCollaborative Teaching and Inclusion

Success for All: Maximizing Digital Accessibility in Special Education Teacher Preparation Courses through Universal Design for Learning

Open access
Kang, Jeongae, Patton, Kimberly, Gardiner-Walsh, Stephanie·2024·Journal of Special Education Preparation

Abstract

Digital accessibility has become one of the most critical components for post-secondary student learning success because accessibility is the first step of learning and the diverse college student population. However, emerging studies showed that teacher candidates experience high challenges in completing the program due to inaccessible course materials or course implementation. Furthermore, teacher educators addressed the need for more knowledge and skills in utilizing digital accessibility. Despite the demands, few guidelines exist for teacher educators to improve classroom digital accessibility. This article suggests multiple avenues of action for teacher educators to enhance accessibility through the lens of universal design for learning so that all teacher candidates with and without disabilities can succeed. Embedded vignettes illustrate an experience of a practicing teacher educator faced with modifying content with increased demands beyond their own training in special education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33043/4a6kfo46

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Digital learning can support students' skill development when instructional media are designed according to their cognitive needs, learning preferences, and technological habits.

    “Digital learning can support students' skill development when instructional media are designed according to their cognitive needs, learning preferences, and technological habits (Kang et al., 2024;Yasmin et al., 2023).”

    From Problem-Based Educational Games for Pancasila Education: Enhancing Elementary Students’ Learning Outcomes through Interactive Digital Media (2026) · cites this paper as Kang et al., 2024

    In “Activate Student Background Knowledge on Digital Tools before Class” (page unavailable), the paper recommends assessing students’ experience with digital tools and says digital supports can develop executive-function skills. It also recommends multiple ways to present materials to meet students’ needs. The copy does not specifically link skill development to designing instructional media around students’ learning preferences and technological habits. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kang, J., Patton, K., & Gardiner-Walsh, S.
Affiliations
Illinois State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Special Education Preparation
Published
2024-01-18
ISSN
2768-1432 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4390965249
Cited by
9
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Special Education Preparation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Journal of Special Education Preparation (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
Keywords
digital accessibility, Universal Design for Learning, special education teacher training, pre-service teachers, course materials, teacher educators, inclusive education, disability, accessible course design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review