Cited by 38Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

The PATHS curriculum for promoting social and emotional well-being among children aged 7–9 years: a cluster RCT

Open access
Humphrey, Neil, Hennessey, Alexandra, Lendrum, Ann, Wigelsworth, Michael, Turner, Alexander, Panayiotou, Margarita, Joyce, Craig, Pert, Kirsty +6 more·2018·Public Health Research

Abstract

Background: Universal social and emotional learning interventions can produce significant practical improvements in children’s social skills and other outcomes. However, the UK evidence base remains limited. Objectives: To investigate the implementation, impact and cost-effectiveness of the Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies (PATHS) curriculum. Design: Cluster randomised controlled trial. Primary schools ( n = 45) were randomly assigned to implement PATHS or to continue with their usual provision for 2 years. Setting: Primary schools in seven local authorities in Greater Manchester. Participants: Children ( n = 5218) in Years 3–5 (aged 7–9 years) attending participating schools. Intervention: PATHS aims to promote children’s social skills via a taught curriculum, which is delivered by the class teacher, generalisation activities and techniques, and supplementary materials for parents. Schools in the usual provision group delivered the Social and Emotional Aspects of Learning programme and related interventions. Main outcome measures: Children’s social skills (primary outcome, assessed by the Social Skills Improvement System); pro-social behaviour and mental health difficulties (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire); psychological well-being, perceptions of peer and social support, and school environment (Kidscreen-27); exclusions, attendance and attainment (National Pupil Database records); and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) (Child Health Utility 9 Dimensions). A comprehensive implementation and process evaluation was undertaken, involving usual provision surveys, structured observations of PATHS lessons, interviews with school staff and parents, and focus groups with children. Results: There was tentative evidence (at a p -value of < 0.10) that PATHS led to very small improvements in children’s social skills, perceptions of peer and social support, and reductions in exclusions immediately following implementation. A very small but statistically significant improvement in children’s psychological well-being [ d = 0.12, 95% confidence interval (CI) –0.02 to 0.25; p < 0.05) was also found. No lasting improvements in any outcomes were observed at 12- or 24-month post-intervention follow-up. PATHS was implemented well, but not at the recommended frequency; our qualitative analysis revealed that this was primarily due to competing priorities and pressure to focus on the core academic curriculum. Higher levels of implementation quality and participant responsiveness were associated with significant improvements in psychological well-being. Finally, the mean incremental cost of PATHS compared with usual provision was determined to be £29.93 per child. Mean incremental QALYs were positive and statistically significant (adjusted mean 0.0019, 95% CI 0.0009 to 0.0029; p < 0.05), and the incremental net benefit of introducing PATHS was determined to be £7.64. The probability of cost-effectiveness in our base-case scenario was 88%. Limitations: Moderate attrition through the course of the main trial, and significant attrition thereafter (although this was mitigated by the use of multiple imputation of missing data); suboptimal frequency of delivery of PATHS lessons. Conclusions: The impact of PATHS was modest and limited, although that which was observed may still represent value for money. Future work should examine the possibility of further modifications to the intervention to improve goodness of fit with the English school context without compromising its efficacy, and identify whether or not particular subgroups benefit differentially from PATHS. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85087674 (the study protocol can be found at: www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/programmes/phr/10300601/#/ ). Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research ; Vol 6, No. 10. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3310/phr06100

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A common barrier to implementation was when teachers noted that the intervention did not fit the context of a UK school or classroom, i.e., a barrier in transferability.

    “Moreover, a common barrier to implementation was when teachers noted that the intervention did not fit the context of a UK school or classroom, or in other words, there was a barrier in the transferability of the programme (e.g., Ashworth 2018; Humphrey et al. 2018).”
  • Teachers appreciated the opportunity to work in groups, especially with supportive group leaders.

    “Teachers appreciated the opportunity to work in groups, especially with supportive group leaders (e.g., Allen et al. 2020; Humphrey et al. 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Humphrey, N., Hennessey, A., Lendrum, A., Wigelsworth, M., Turner, A., Panayiotou, M., Joyce, C., Pert, K., Stephens, E., Wo, L., Squires, G., Woods, K., Harrison, M., & Calam, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Manchester (GB)
  • Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Humphrey, Neil
Venue
Public Health Research
Published
2018-08
Volume
6
Issue
10
Pages
1-116
ISSN
  • 2050-4381 (ISSN-L)
  • 2050-439X
OpenAlex
W2889094576
Cited by
38
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
8.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Public Health Research (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Public Health Research programme (10/3006/01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
social-emotional learning, social skills, child mental health, psychological well-being, prosocial behavior, school exclusion, implementation quality, cost-effectiveness, quality-adjusted life years, elementary school students, Social Skills Improvement System, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, KIDSCREEN-27, school-based intervention, implementation process evaluation, parental involvement, social support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review