Cited by 32Mental Health Treatment and AccessOccupational Health and BurnoutPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Risk of Psychological Distress, Pervasiveness of Stigma and Utilisation of Support Services: Exploring Paramedic Perceptions

Open access
Mackinnon, Kelly, Everett, Timothy, Holmes, Lisa, Smith, Erin, Mills, Brennen·2020·Australasian Journal of Paramedicine

Abstract

Introduction: Paramedics are exposed to significant and cumulative stressors that contribute to poor mental health. The provision of effective and engaging mental health support is essential in improving overall wellbeing. Many ambulance services have adapted their available support services to reflect this need. However, there remains limited research into the perceived efficacy of these services and barriers that limit uptake from paramedics. Methods: Paramedics and ambulance volunteers from Australia and New Zealand were invited to complete an online survey consisting of a series of Likert-scale and open-ended response questions. The well-validated Kessler Psychological Distress Scale was also incorporated into the online survey. Results: A total of 184 participants completed the survey. A total of 50 (27%) participants reported high/very high levels of psychological distress. Participants exposed to at least one adverse event while working reported higher psychological distress scores than those that had not. Just over half (51%) of all participants disagreed/strongly disagreed there was no stigma associated with seeking mental health support from paramedic colleagues and 54% of participants disagreed/strongly disagreed there was no stigma from managerial staff. Conclusion: These findings suggest paramedics are at a greater risk of psychological distress than the general population. This is particularly problematic given there is a clear perception of ongoing stigma among paramedics associated with the utilisation of mental health support services. Future research should explore methods for reducing stigma and encouraging help-seeking behaviours in this vulnerable population throughout all phases of an emergency service workers career.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33151/ajp.17.764

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mackinnon, K., Everett, T., Holmes, L., Smith, E., & Mills, B.
Affiliations
Edith Cowan University (AU)
Venue
Australasian Journal of Paramedicine
Published
2020-01
Volume
17
Pages
1-7
ISSN
2202-7270 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3037062004
Cited by
32
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (publishedVersion)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
paramedics, psychological distress, mental health stigma, help-seeking, mental health support services, ambulance services, occupational stress, adverse events, emergency workers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review