Cited by 283Lymphatic System and DiseasesCancer survivorship and careBreast Cancer Treatment Studies

Lymphedema: current issues in research and management

Open access
Petrek, J. A., Pressman, P. I., Smith, R. A.·2000·CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians

Abstract

Lymphedema is a common and troublesome problem that can develop following breast cancer treatment. As with other quality-of-life and nonlethal conditions, it receives less research funding and attention than do many other areas of study. In 1998, an invited workshop sponsored by the American Cancer Society reviewed and evaluated the current state of knowledge about lymphedema. Recommendations and research initiatives proposed by the 60 international participants are presented in the conclusion section of the article, following a summary of current knowledge of the anatomy, physiology, detection, and current treatment of lymphedema. The etiology of lymphedema is multifaceted; all of the factors that contribute to the condition and the nature of their interaction have not yet been identified. To compound the problem, methods of assessing the degree of arm and hand swelling vary and are not agreed upon, and reliable methods of assessing the functional impact of lymphedema have not yet been developed. In the absence of a cure for lymphedema, precautions and prevention are emphasized. Current treatments include elevation, elastic garments, pneumatic compression pumps, and complete decongestive therapy; surgical and medical techniques remain controversial. Elements and details of these treatments are described.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3322/canjclin.50.5.292

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

19 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petrek, J. A., Pressman, P. I., & Smith, R. A.
Affiliations
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
Venue
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-09-01
Volume
50
Issue
5
Pages
292-307
ISSN
0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129470637
Cited by
283
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Lymphatic System and Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Keywords
lymphedema, breast cancer treatment, lymphedema treatment, decongestive therapy, intermittent pneumatic compression, altitude, lymphedema prevention
MeSH terms
American Cancer Society, Breast Neoplasms, Congresses as Topic, Female, Humans, Lymphedema, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review