The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer
Open accessAbstract
Each year the American Cancer Society publishes a summary of existing recommendations for early cancer detection, including updates, and/or emerging issues that are relevant to screening for cancer. In last year's article, the guidelines regarding screening for the early detection of prostate, colorectal, and endometrial cancers were updated, as was the narrative pertaining to testing for early lung cancer detection. Although none of the ACS's guidelines were updated in 2001, work is proceeding on an update of screening recommendations for breast and cervical cancer and an update of these guidelines will be announced in the January/February 2003 issue of CA. As in previous issues, we review recommendations for the "cancer-related check-up," in which clinical encounters provide case-finding and health counseling opportunities. Finally, we provide an update of the most recent data pertaining to participation rates in cancer screening by age, gender, and ethnicity from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and National Health Interview Survey (NHIS).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Burke, W. (1997) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.277.12.997 · Cited by 955
Ruffin, M. T., Gorenflo, D. W., & Woodman, B. (2000) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.13.1.1 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Kushi, L. H., Byers, T., Doyle, C., Bandera, E. V., McCullough, M., Gansler, T., Andrews, K. S., Thun, M. J., & The American Cancer Society 2006 Nutrition and Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee (2006) · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.56.5.254 · Cited by 1,901
Quality indicators for colonoscopy
Rex, D. K., Schoenfeld, P. S., Cohen, J., Pike, I. M., Adler, D. G., Fennerty, M. B., Lieb, J. G., Park, W. G., Rizk, M. K., Sawhney, M. S., et al. (2015) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058 · Cited by 1,764
Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients: A Framework for Individualized Decision Making
Walter, L. C., & Covinsky, K. E. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.285.21.2750 · Cited by 1,003
Fecal DNA versus Fecal Occult Blood for Colorectal-Cancer Screening in an Average-Risk Population
Imperiale, T. F., Ransohoff, D. F., Itzkowitz, S. H., Turnbull, B. A., & Ross, M. E. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa033403 · Cited by 803
Adverse Events After Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Medicare Population
Warren, J. L., Klabunde, C. N., Mariotto, A. B., Meekins, A., Topor, M., Brown, M. L., & Ransohoff, D. F. (2009) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008 · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., von Eschenbach, A. C., Levin, B., Cohen, C., Runowicz, C. D., Sener, S., Saslow, D., & Eyre, H. J.
- Venue
- CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-01-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-22
- ISSN
- 0007-9235 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2471590298
- Cited by
- 1,588
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 52.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3322/canjclin.52.1.8
- The paper
- Smith, R. A., Cokkinides, V., von Eschenbach, A. C., Levin, B., Cohen, C., Runowicz, C. D., Sener, S., Saslow, D., & Eyre, H. J. (2002). American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.52.1.8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
