THE CONSIDERATION OF MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY IN FORECAST AND MAINTENANCE RELATED DECISIONS
Open accessAbstract
In the field of operations management, most decisions are seen as being based on measurement results. However, every measurement has some uncertainty and therefore managerial decisions can be incorrect. Measurement uncertainty can cause particularly large losses in the case of maintenance decisions, where decision error can cause the breakdown of the entire production or service process. Taking measurement uncertainty into consideration the losses can be decreased. The standards, technical reports and guides dealing with measurement uncertainty use probability approach and focus on the metrology aspect. They do not support a risk based decision based on the forecast of the observed characteristics. In the proposed risk based model the realized (or lost) revenue is treated along with the occurred costs in order to maximize the profit with the help of analytic calculation and simulations. This paper suggests that by treating measurement results as a time series the time of probable failure can be predicted at a given confidence level, this can support the scheduling of maintenance tasks. The uncertainty of measurement and the uncertainty of forecasting can be treated in the same model. Key words: forecast, measurement uncertainty, risk-based maintenance, stochastic process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Uncertainties caused by sensor degradation and limitations in degradation mechanisms can lead to inaccurate determination of machinery condition, which in turn affects the reliability of maintenance decisions.
“However, the uncertainties caused by sensor degradation and limitations in degradation mechanisms can lead to inaccurate determination of machinery condition, which in turn affects the reliability of maintenance decisions (Li et al., 2021;Huynh, Barros and Bérenguer, 2012;Hegedus & Kosztyán, 2011).”
From Impact of Sensor Degradation on Measurement Uncertainty in Prognostics and Maintenance Decision-Making: (2025) · cites this paper as Hegedus & Kosztyán, 2011
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thai, T.-T. N., Do, P., Iung, B., & Gardoni, P. (2025) · International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management · doi:10.36001/ijphm.2025.v16i4.4306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hegedűs, C., & Kosztyán, Z. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Pannonia (HU)
- Corresponding author
- Hegedűs, Csaba
- ORCID
- Kosztyán, Zsolt T.
- Venue
- Problems of Management in the 21st Century
- Publisher
- Scientia Socialis Ltd
- Published
- 2011-05-10
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 46-59
- ISSN
- 2029-6932 (ISSN-L)
- 2538-712X
- OpenAlex
- W4243072257
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Problems of Management in the 21st Century (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Optimization Techniques
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Scientific Measurement and Uncertainty Evaluation
- Keywords
- measurement uncertainty, risk-based maintenance, maintenance scheduling, forecast uncertainty, failure prediction, profit maximization, stochastic processes, decision making under uncertainty, operations management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review