Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX

Open access
Dimopoulos, Meletios A., San-Miguel, Jesus, Belch, Andrew, White, Darrell, Benboubker, Lotfi, Cook, Gordon, Leiba, Merav, Morton, James, Ho, P. Joy, Kim, Kihyun, Takezako, Naoki, Moreau, Philippe, Kaufman, Jonathan L., Sutherland, Heather J., Lalancette, Marc, Magen, Hila, Iida, Shinsuke, Kim, Jin Seok, Prince, H. Miles, Cochrane, Tara, Oriol, Albert, Bahlis, Nizar J., Chari, Ajai, O’Rourke, Lisa, Wu, Kaida, Schecter, Jordan M., Casneuf, Tineke, Chiu, Christopher, Soong, David, Sasser, A. Kate, Khokhar, Nushmia Z., Avet-Loiseau, Hervé, Usmani, Saad Z.·2018·Haematologica

Abstract

In the POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone significantly reduced risk of progression/death versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone alone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. We provide one additional year of follow up and include the effect on minimal residual disease and in clinically relevant subgroups. After 25.4 months of follow up, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone prolonged progression-free survival versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone alone (median not reached vs. 17.5 months; hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.53; P

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3324/haematol.2018.194282

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Dimopoulos, M. A., San-Miguel, J., Belch, A., White, D., Benboubker, L., Cook, G., Leiba, M., Morton, J., Ho, P. J., Kim, K., Takezako, N., Moreau, P., Kaufman, J. L., Sutherland, H. J., Lalancette, M., Magen, H., Iida, S., Kim, J. S., Prince, H. M., Cochrane, T., Oriol, A., Bahlis, N. J., Chari, A., O’Rourke, L., Wu, K., Schecter, J. M., Casneuf, T., Chiu, C., Soong, D., Sasser, A. K., Khokhar, N. Z., Avet-Loiseau, H., & Usmani, S. Z.
Venue
Haematologica
Published
2018-09-20
Volume
103
Issue
12
Pages
2088-2096
ISSN
  • 0390-6078 (ISSN-L)
  • 1592-8721
OpenAlex
W2890977830
Cited by
210
References
7
FWCI
22.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3324/haematol.2018.194282
The paper
Dimopoulos, M. A., San-Miguel, J., Belch, A., White, D., Benboubker, L., Cook, G., Leiba, M., Morton, J., Ho, P. J., Kim, K., Takezako, N., Moreau, P., Kaufman, J. L., Sutherland, H. J., Lalancette, M., Magen, H., Iida, S., Kim, J. S., Prince, H. M., . . . Usmani, S. Z. (2018). Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: updated analysis of POLLUX. Haematologica. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.194282

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.