The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distortion, confusion, and impasses: could a public dialogue within Knowledge Landscapes contribute to better communication and understanding of innovative knowledge?
Open accessAbstract
In contrast to former discussions focusing on dialogue between science, policy makers, and the public, the aim of this paper was to focus on the broader com-municative situation related to the inno ...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In digital society, knowledge is organized in dynamic tentative online infrastructures and made available to users through different search tools and engines and their operative algorithms.
“In the digital society, knowledge is organized in dynamic tentative online infrastructures and made available to users through different search tools and engines and their operative algorithms.”
From Concepts and definitions of health and health-related values in the knowledge landscapes of the digital society (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
‘The need to communicate innovative knowledge’ (page unavailable) says that information is widely available through internet-stored data, and ‘Scenarios of innovative knowledge communication’ describes its distribution through online media. The paper does not describe knowledge as organized in tentative online infrastructures or say that search tools, search engines, and their algorithms make it available. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredDigital society frames, alters, and produces knowledge in a complex way, and individuals need skills to read these continuously changing landscapes critically and navigate them safely.
“This means that digital society frames, alters, and produces knowledge in a complex way, and the individuals today need skills to read these continuously changing landscapes critically and navigate them safely (1,2,19,20).”
From Concepts and definitions of health and health-related values in the knowledge landscapes of the digital society (2017) · cites this paper as [1]
The ‘Scenarios of innovative knowledge communication’ section describes changing, overlapping communication pathways and a need for people with the competence to analyze them. The ‘Knowledge Landscapes and the “medialization” of science’ section says communication can transform the meaning of scientific knowledge. The paper focuses on innovative scientific knowledge, however; it does not establish the broader claim that digital society produces knowledge generally or that individuals can navigate these landscapes safely. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- [1]Metzler I Webster A Bio-objects and their boundaries: governing matters at the intersection of society, politics, and science. Croat Med J 2011 52 648 50 21990084 PMC3195975
- [2]Svalastog AL Martinelli L Representing life as opposed to being: the bio-objectification process of the HeLa cells and its relation to personalized medicine. Croat Med J 2013 54 397 402 23986283 PMC3763245
- [3]Maeseele P Allgaier J Martinelli L Bio-objects and the media: The role of communication in bio-objectification processes. Croat Med J 2013 54 301 5 23771763 PMC3692340
- [4]Maeseele P Hendrickx K Pavone V Van Hoyweghen I Bio-objects’ political capacity: a research agenda. Croat Med J 2013 54 206 11 23630150 PMC3641879
- [8]Habermas J. Between facts and norms: contribution to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1996.
- [10]Rodder S, Franzen M, Weingart P, editors. The sciences' media connection – public communication and its repercussions. Dordrecht: Springer; 2012.
- [13]Furlan P Feeling the Pulse: Journalists, Public Relations Practitioners and Medical News Reporting. Australian Journalism Review. 2009 31 61 74
- [14]Svalastog AL Gene Myths in Public Perception. Public Underst Sci 2012 21 478 94 23038860
- [16]Árnason V Scientific citizenship in a democratic society. Public Underst Sci 2013 22 927 40 23825245
- [21]Gundert-Remy U Dimovski A Gajovic S Personalised medicine – where do we stand? Pouring some water in the wine: a realistic perspective. Croat Med J 2012 53 314 20 22911523 PMC3428819
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Svalastog, A. L., Donev, D., Jahren Kristoffersen, N., & Gajović, S. (2017) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2017.58.431 · Cited by 225
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Svalastog, A. L., Allgaier, J., Martinelli, L., & Gajovic, S.
- Affiliations
- Uppsala University (SE)
- Museo delle Scienze (IT)
- Venue
- Croatian Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Croatian Medical Journals
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 54-60
- ISSN
- 0353-9504 (ISSN-L)
- 1332-8166
- PMC
- PMC3945464
- OpenAlex
- W2002299109
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 9.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Croatian Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository of the Medical Faculty of the University of Zagreb (University of Zagreb) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Keywords
- knowledge landscape, public dialogue, science communication, innovative knowledge, knowledge transfer, science-policy dialogue, public understanding of science, communication barriers
- MeSH terms
- Communication, Confusion, Humans, Public Opinion, Public Relations, Knowledge, Inventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
