The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When communicating health-related knowledge, beware of the black holes of the knowledge landscapes geography
Open accessAbstract
Health-related knowledge is a complicated mixture of levels and dimensions including molecular research, clinical research, well established practices, new technologies and treatments, specialized and individualized life-style recommendations, and quality of life factors.As it concerns everything from microbiology to social well-being, this complex landscape of knowledge is difficult to grasp even by medical professionals.Despite its complexity, the relevance of this knowledge is obvious for the individuals, their families, their professional environment, and the society as a whole.Understanding health-related knowledge is a prerequisite for patient-centered medicine, and being acquainted with the newest developments can imply better health, higher quality of life, and better medical treatment (1,2).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In the digital society, knowledge is organized in dynamic tentative online infrastructures and made available to users through different search tools and engines and their operative algorithms.”
From Concepts and definitions of health and health-related values in the knowledge landscapes of the digital society (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“This means that digital society frames, alters, and produces knowledge in a complex way, and the individuals today need skills to read these continuously changing landscapes critically and navigate them safely (1,2,19,20).”
From Concepts and definitions of health and health-related values in the knowledge landscapes of the digital society (2017) · cites this paper as [2]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- [1]Bardes CL Defining “patient-centered medicine”. N Engl J Med 2012 366 782 3 10.1056/NEJMp1200070 22375968 · DOI
- [2]Sacristán JA Patient-centered medicine and patient-oriented research: improving health outcomes for individual patients. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013 13 6 10.1186/1472-6947-13-6 23294526 PMC3575265 · DOI
- [3]Pelucchi C Bosetti C Galeone C La Vecchia C Dietary acrylamide and cancer risk: an updated meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 2015 136 2912 22 10.1002/ijc.29339 25403648 · DOI
- [4]Hamstra-Wright KL Bliven KC Bay C Risk factors for medial tibial stress syndrome in physically active individuals such as runners and military personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015 49 362 9 10.1136/bjsports-2014-093462 25185588 · DOI
- [5]Poklepovic T Worthington HV Johnson TM Sambunjak D Imai P Clarkson JE Interdental brushing for the prevention and control of periodontal diseases and dental caries in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 12 CD009857 24353078
- [6]Svalastog AL Allgaier J Martinelli L Gajovic S Distortion, confusion, and impasses: could a public dialogue within Knowledge Landscapes contribute to better communication and understanding of innovative knowledge? Croat Med J 2014 55 54 60 10.3325/cmj.2014.55.54 24577828 PMC3945464 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Svalastog AL Allgaier J Gajović S Navigating knowledge landscapes: on health, science, communication, media, and society. Croat Med J 2015 56 321 3 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.321 26321023 PMC4576744 · DOI · Paper page
- [8]Barić H Polšek D Andrijašević L Gajović S Open access – is this the future of medical publishing? Croat Med J 2013 54 315 8 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.315 23986271 PMC3763246 · DOI
- [9]Holone H The filter bubble and its effect on online personal health information. Croat Med J 2016 57 298 301 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.298 27374832 PMC4937233 · DOI
- [10]Kuhn T. The Structure of scientific revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2012.
- [11]Fox Keller E. Making sense of life. Explaining biological developments with models, metaphors, and machines. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2002. 15366125
- [12]Epstein S. Inclusion: the politics of difference in medical research (Chicago Studies in Practices of Meaning). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2010.
- [13]Todt O Luján JL Analyzing precautionary regulation: do precaution, science, and innovation go together? Risk Anal 2014 34 2163 73 10.1111/risa.12246 24975619 · DOI
- [14]Svalastog AL. PhD thesis. I didn’t know… Induced abortion and the process of gender construction, a theoretical feminist contribution. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 1998; In Norwegian with an English summary.
- [15]Allgaier J Svalastog AL The communication aspects of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in Western Africa–do we need to counter one, two, or many epidemics? Croat Med J 2015 56 496 9 10.3325/cmj.2015.56.496 26526888 PMC4655935 · DOI · Paper page
- [16]Pariser E. The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. London: Penguin UK; 2011.
- [18]Svalastog AL Treacherous narratives & seductive theories. On methodological challenges in psychosocial academic work. New Zealand Online Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. 2015 1 13 36
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Svalastog, A. L., Donev, D., Jahren Kristoffersen, N., & Gajović, S. (2017) · Croatian Medical Journal · doi:10.3325/cmj.2017.58.431 · Cited by 225
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gajović, S., & Svalastog, A. L.
- Affiliations
- Østfold University of Applied Sciences (NO)
- Venue
- Croatian Medical Journal
- Publisher
- Croatian Medical Journals
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 504-509
- ISSN
- 0353-9504 (ISSN-L)
- 1332-8166
- PMC
- PMC5141464
- OpenAlex
- W2561079406
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 6.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Croatian Medical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Dr Med - University of Zagreb School of Medicine Digital Repository (acceptedVersion)
- BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)) (acceptedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (316120)
- Norges Forskningsråd
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Keywords
- health knowledge, knowledge communication, knowledge landscape, patient-centered medicine, medical professionals, quality of life
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review