Prevalence of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Nepal: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus is a condition of glucose intolerance during pregnancy. The burden of Gestational diabetes mellitus is ever increasing including a lower middle-income country like Nepal. Methods: This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance to the guidance of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases of “Embase”, “Google Scholar”, “Scopus”, “Web of Science” were searched for observational studies in Nepal from 2000 to July 2021. Random effect model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence subgroup analysis.Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis analyzed 9 studies with a total of 20865 participants. Pooled prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus was 2.61% (95% CI: 1.25- 5.37). From subgroup analysis, the prevalence of Gestational diabetes mellitus according to the diagnostic criteria were: International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria 6.56% (95% CI: 4.79-8.92), World Health Organization (WHO) criteria 4.81% (95% CI: 3.79-6.08), Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) criteria 4.71% (95% CI: 3.06-7.18), Carpenter and Coustan criteria (CC) 1.08% (95% CI: 0.43-2.71); prevalence according to the publication time: before 2015 1.20% (95% CI: 3.64-6.41), in and after 2015 4.84% (95% CI: 0.42-3.39); prevalence according to the place: within Kathmandu valley 2.70% (95% CI: 1.17-6.08), outside Kathmandu valley 2.28% (95% CI: 0.26-17.15).Conclusion: Our study revealed the increasing prevalence of GDM in Nepal. Further large observational studies at local levels are essential to measure the actual burden, risk factors and potential preventive measures for Gestational diabetes mellitus. Keywords: Diabetes in pregnancy; gestational diabetes mellitus; meta-analysis; Nepal; prevalence.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Nepal, Pashupati et al. analyzed 20,865 cases in 2022 and estimated total GDM incidence at 6.56% using IADPSG, 4.81% using WHO, and 4.71% using DIPSI guidelines.
“In 2022 Pashupati et al. analyzed 20,865 cases and estimated the total incidence of GDM at 6.56% using the IADPSG criteria, 4.81% using the (WHO) criteria and 4.71% using the Diabetes in Pregnancy Study Group of India (DIPSI) guidelines [214].”
From Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century (2022) · cites this paper as [214]
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Epidemiology and management of gestational diabetes
Sweeting, A., Hannah, W., Backman, H., Catalano, P., Feghali, M., Herman, W. H., Hivert, M.-F., Immanuel, J., Meek, C., Oppermann, M. L., et al. (2024) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)00825-0 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Evolution of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus across Continents in 21st Century
Dłuski, D. F., Ruszała, M., Rudziński, G., Pożarowska, K., Brzuszkiewicz, K., & Leszczyńska-Gorzelak, B. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph192315804 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Payot, M. D., Villavieja, A., & Pineda-Cortel, M. R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms251910527 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Chaudhary, K., Nepal, J., Thapaliya, S., Banjara, S., Shrestha, A., Shakya, P., Shrestha, A., & Rawal, S. (2024) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-024-01540-1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Self-citationPark, S., Kim, B.-C., Paudel, J., & Park, H. O. (2023) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3343250/v1 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Pandit, A., Sapkota, B., Poudel, N., Karki, R., Poudel, B., & Lamichhane, R. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0313755 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Feyissa, T. R., Vasilevski, V., Geleto, A. B., & Sweet, L. P. (2026) · Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2026.103485 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pokharel, P., Pokhrel, K. M., Lamichhane, P., Khanal, K., & Rawal, S.
- Affiliations
- Maharajgunj Medical Campus (NP)
- Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital (NP)
- Venue
- Journal of Nepal Health Research Council
- Publisher
- Nepal Health Research Council
- Published
- 2022-06-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 01
- Pages
- 12-20
- ISSN
- 1727-5482 (ISSN-L)
- 1999-6217
- OpenAlex
- W4291020902
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Nepal Health Research Council (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Journal of Nepal Health Research Council (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, prevalence, Nepal, diagnostic criteria, IADPSG criteria, WHO criteria, DIPSI criteria, Carpenter and Coustan criteria, Kathmandu Valley
- MeSH terms
- Female, Humans, Nepal, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Diabetes, Gestational, Glucose Intolerance
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review