Cited by 17Biofield Effects and BiophysicsParanormal Experiences and BeliefsElectromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects

Consciousness, The Human Heart and The Global Energetic Field Environment

Open access
McCraty, Rollin, Al Abdulgader, Abdullah·2021·Cardiology & Vascular Research

Abstract

The Global Coherence Initiative (GCI) is a science-based, international effort that conducts research on interactions between humans and the Earth's magnetic field environment as well as collective intention on promoting peace, and harmony.In order to carry out one aspect of the interconnectedness research, GCI has created a Global Coherence Monitoring System (GCMS), which is comprised of a network of six magnetometers specifically designed to measure geomagnetic and resonant frequencies in Earth's magnetic fields, such as Schumann resonances, Alven waves and other field-line resonances.The finding from this line of research suggests that global collective behaviors and numerous human physiological rhythms are affected by and in some cases synchronized with solar and geomagnetic activity.Additionally, we discuss why the majority of research conducted thus far has focused on how disruptions in the earth's magnetic fields are associated with adverse effects on health and behaviors.However, it is important to note, that solar and geomagnetic activity can also have a positive impact on human physiology and health.Furthermore, we believe there is an even more fundamental and important aspect of the earth's magnetic fields that can be utilized to help lift human consciousness.We propose that the earth's magnetic fields provide a plausible mechanism that interconnects and non-locally distributes information to all living systems on our planet.We review several independent lines of research that support the hypothesis that the earth's magnetic fields can act as a carrier of and encoded by physiologically patterned and relevant information.The four primary hypotheses of the GCI are articulated and the existing theoretical and experimental support for each hypothesis is discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.33425/2639-8486.s1-1002

Cites

119 of 119 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At present, evidence linking cardiac electromagnetic activity to autonomic regulation, emotional states, and geomagnetic variability remains largely observational and does not establish causality.

    “At present, evidence linking cardiac electromagnetic activity to autonomic regulation, emotional states, and geomagnetic variability remains largely observational and does not establish causality [20,21,61,62].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    In “Interactions between the Cardiovascular System and Fieldline Resonances” (page not provided), the paper reports a study in which people were subjected to simulated pulsating fields and describes the evidence for effects of planetary magnetic fields as “quite strong and convincing.” In “Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information” (page not provided), it says the heart’s electromagnetic field can mediate physiological synchronization. The source thus presents experimental evidence and causal interpretations rather than characterizing the evidence as largely observational and unable to establish causality. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The heart is the body's largest bioelectrical source, producing stronger surface potentials than nerves or skeletal muscle.

    “The heart is the body’s largest bioelectrical source, producing stronger surface potentials than nerves or skeletal muscle [20,21,22].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    In “Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information” (page unavailable), the paper says the heart generates the largest rhythmic electromagnetic field of any organ, about 100 times stronger than the brain’s. It does not compare surface electrical potentials from the heart with those from nerves or skeletal muscle, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • HEMF field strength is approximately 1 nT near the myocardium, 0.1 nT at the body surface, and 10-100 pT a few centimeters above the chest.

    “Field strength is ~1 nT near the myocardium, ~0.1 nT at the body surface, and 10–100 pT a few centimeters above the chest—much weaker than the Earth’s field but far stronger than cortical sources [Figure 1] [20,21,22,23,25,26,27].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The ‘Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information’ section says the heart’s field is measured in the nanotesla range, but gives no strength at the myocardium, body surface, or a few centimeters above the chest. The ‘Magnetic Fields’ section gives the Earth’s field as 25–65 microteslas; neither section substantiates the claim’s three location-specific estimates. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • SQUIDs remain essential tools for validating the foundations of the heart's electromagnetic structure and coherence due to femtotesla sensitivity and vector-field reconstruction capability.

    “Due to their femtotesla sensitivity and vector-field reconstruction capability, SQUIDs remain essential tools for validating the foundations of the heart’s electromagnetic structure and coherence [20,21,23,25,26].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    The section “Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information” (page unavailable) says SQUIDs markedly increased the sensitivity of biomagnetic measurements and discusses the heart’s electromagnetic field. It does not specify femtotesla sensitivity or say SQUIDs are essential for validating cardiac coherence; vector-field reconstruction appears only indirectly in the title of a work listed in the References. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Magnetic fields can transmit emotions and intent.

    “further confirming the ability of magnetic fields to transmit emotions and intent while also highlighting the importance of empathy in clinical practice [21,88,92].”

    From The Heart’s Electromagnetic Field in Emotions, Empathy and Human Connection: Biosensor-Derived Insights into Heart–Brain Axis Mechanisms and a Basis for Novel BioMagnetoTherapies (2026) · cites this paper as [21]

    In “Magnetic Fields Carry Biologically Relevant Information,” the paper says emotional-state information is encoded in the heart’s magnetic field and radiated into the environment. In “Earth’s Energetic Systems and Human Health and Behavior,” it suggests that emotions and intentions can affect others, while section 4 describes intentional encoding in magnetic fields as speculation. The unqualified claim that magnetic fields can transmit both emotions and intent is therefore stronger than the paper’s account of intent. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Lloyd A, Brett D, Wesnes K. Coherence Training Improves Cognitive Functions and Behavior In Children with ADHD. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2010; 16: 34-42.
  2. Tiller W. towards a predictive model of subtle domain connections to the physical domain of reality: origins of wave- particle dualtity, electric-magnetic monpoles and the mirror principle. JSE. 1999; 13: 41-67.
  3. Pribram KH. The Form within (Prospect Press. 2013).
  4. Novik O, Smirnov F, Volgin M. Electromagnetic Geophysical Fields: Precursors to Earthquakes and Tsunamis: Impacts on the Brain and Heart Fields. (Springer Nature Switzerland. 2019).
  5. Tchijevsky AL. Physical Factors of the Historical Process. Cycles. 1971; 22: 11-27.
  6. Persinger M. On the possible representation of the electromagnetic equivalents of all human memory within the earth's magnetic field: Implications of theoretical biology. Theoretical Biology Insights. 2008; 1: 3-11.
  7. Persinger MA. On the possibility of directly accessing every human brain by electromagnetic induction of the fundamental algorithms Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1995; 80: 791-799.
  8. McCraty R. in 3rd Heart: King of organrs conference (Hufuf, Saudi Arabia 2010).
  9. Ertel S. Space weather and revolutions: Chizhevsky's heliobiological claim scrutinized. Studia Psychologica. 1996; 39: 3-22.
  10. Ertel S. Cosmo physical correlations of creative activity in cultural history. Biophysics. 1998; 43: 696-702.
  11. Nelson R. Effects of Globally Shared Attention and Emotion. Journal of Cosmology. 2011; 4.
  12. Morris SM. Facilitating collective coherence: Group Effects on Heart Rate Variability Coherence and Heart Rhythm Synchronization. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine. 2010; 16: 62-72.
  13. McCraty R. In Bio electromagnetic and Subtle Energy Medicine, Second Edition (ed Paul J. Rosch). Marcel Dekker. 2015; 541-562.
  14. Vares MAP. Correlations between a New Daily Global Indicator of Human Behavior, Threshold Seismicity, and Solar Activity: Congruence of Energy and Implications. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research. 2015; 15.
  15. Cernouss S, Vinogradov A, Vlassova E. Geophysical Hazard for Human Health in the Circumpolar Auroral Belt: Evidence of a Relationship between Heart Rate Variation and Electromagnetic Disturbances. Natural Hazards. 2001; 23: 121-135.
  16. McCraty R, Shaffer F. Heart Rate Variability: New Perspectives on Physiological Mechanisms, Assessment of Self-regulatory Capacity, and Health Risk. Global advances in health and medicine: improving healthcare outcomes worldwide. 2015; 4: 46-61.
  17. Chernouss S, Vinogradov A, Vlassova E. Geophysical Hazard for Human Health in the Circumpolar Auroral Belt: Evidence of a Relationship between Heart Rate Variation and Electromagnetic Disturbances. Natural hazards. 2001; 23: 121-135.
  18. Schumann W, Konig H. Uber die beobachtung von "atmospherics" bei geringsten frequenzen. Die Naturwissenschaften. 1954; 41: 183-184.
  19. Pobachenko SV, Kolesnik AG, Borodin AS, et al. The Contigency of Parameters of Human Encephalograms and Schumann Resonance Electromagnetic Fields Revealed in Monitoring Studies. Complex Systems Biophysics. 2006; 51: 480-483.
  20. Belov DR, Kanunikov IE, Kiselev BV. Dependence of human EEG synchronization on the geomagnetic activity on the day of experiment. Ross Fiziol Zh Im I M Sechenova. 1998; 84: 761-774.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCraty, R., & Al Abdulgader, A.
Affiliations
HeartMath Institute (US)
Venue
Cardiology & Vascular Research
Published
2021-01-31
Volume
5
Issue
1
ISSN
2639-8486 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3130035102
Cited by
17
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Cardiology & Vascular Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects
Keywords
geomagnetic field, Schumann resonance, Alfvén waves, field line resonance, collective intentionality, human consciousness, solar activity, non-local information transfer, magnetometer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review