The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Statistical messages from ARRIVE 2.0 guidelines
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The need for an appropriate sample size calculation has become a major trend in research.
“Although there have been debates on sample size calculation and power analysis [3,4,6], the need for an appropriate sample size calculation has become a major trend in research [1,2,7-11].”
From Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software (2021) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
Percie du Sert, N., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410 · Cited by 5,939
The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique
(1960) · The Medical Journal of Australia · doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.1960.tb73127.x · Cited by 5,045
The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research
du Sert, N. P., Hurst, V., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., et al. (2020) · Experimental Physiology · doi:10.1113/ep088870 · Cited by 3,545
Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0
Percie du Sert, N., Ahluwalia, A., Alam, S., Avey, M. T., Baker, M., Browne, W. J., Clark, A., Cuthill, I. C., Dirnagl, U., Emerson, M., et al. (2020) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000411 · Cited by 2,677
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
Head, M. L., Holman, L., Lanfear, R., Kahn, A. T., & Jennions, M. D. (2015) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106 · Cited by 1,388
Reproducibility in Science: Improving the Standard for Basic and Preclinical Research
Begley, C. G., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2015) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.114.303819 · Cited by 1,035
The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
van der Weyden, M. V. (2006) · doi:10.2349/biij.2.4.e54-13 · Cited by 110
ICMJE (2024) · Ewha Medical Journal · doi:10.12771/emj.2024.e48 · Cited by 18
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software
Kang, H. (2021) · Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions · doi:10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17 · Cited by 2,572
“Although there have been debates on sample size calculation and power analysis [3,4,6], the need for an appropriate sample size calculation has become a major trend in research [1,2,7-11].”
BackgroundSelf-citationChoi, G. J., Kang, H., Lee, O. H., Ahn, E. J., White, F. A., Cho, Y., Baek, C. W., Jung, Y. H., & Kwon, J. (2022) · BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies · doi:10.1186/s12906-021-03491-z · Cited by 7
“Methods This randomised controlled experimental study was performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and described according to the Animal Research: Reporting In Vivo Experiments (ARRIVE) guidelines [8, 9].”
MethodSelf-citationSafaei, S., Heydari, S., Manshadi, M. D., Ashtari, B., Gholipourmalekabadi, M., Sasani, F., Hashemi, F., Vosoogh, M., Madjd, Z., & Ghods, R. (2025) · Materials Advances · doi:10.1039/d5ma00664c · Cited by 6
Drude, N., Martinez‐Gamboa, L., Danziger, M., Collazo, A., Kniffert, S., Wiebach, J., Nilsonne, G., Konietschke, F., Piper, S. K., Pawel, S., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1855244/v1 · Cited by 1
Animals in Research in the Pharmaceutical Industry
Landi, M. S. (2023) · Collaborative bioethics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29451-8_29
Agreement of farm animal behaviour and welfare studies with the ARRIVE Essential 10
Calderón-Amor, J., Luna, D., & Tadich, T. (2023) · Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/17470161231183100
“…validity and robustness of results (Percie du Sert et al., 2020), but also avoids small sample sizes that do not allow the application of proper statistical methods, or excessive sample sizes that result in wastage and raise ethical, scientific, and economic issues (Ding et al., 2022; Kang, 2021).”
BackgroundMethod
Metadata
- Authors
- Kang, H.
- Affiliations
- Chung-Ang University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kang, Hyun
- ORCID
- Kang, Hyun
- Venue
- The Korean Journal of Pain
- Publisher
- Korean Pain Society
- Published
- 2021-01-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-3
- ISSN
- 1226-2579 (ISSN-L)
- 2005-9159
- 2093-0569
- PMC
- PMC7783855
- OpenAlex
- W3113743276
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Korean journal of pain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, statistical reporting, animal studies, reproducibility, pain research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
