The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria
Open accessAbstract
The content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur was measured in individual cells from 6 native aquatic samples and 4 samples of cultured bacteria by X-ray microanalysis using a transmission electron microscope (TEM).The molar C N:P ratio for the pooled sample was 50:lO:l From length and width measurements of unfixed air-dried cells we estimated cell volumes over a total range of 0.0026 to 15.8 pm3.and mean C:volume ratios of 30 to 162 fg for the samples included.For the marine samples we found mean N:C ratios of 0.25 to 0.28, while cells from fresh or brackish waters had mean N:C ratios of 0.17 to 0.20, indicating differences in nutrient availability.The P:C ratios for the samples analyzed varied from 0.040 to 0.090, with a pooled mean of 0.052, which is approximately twice that of the Redfield ratio for P C .For 0:C ratios we estimated a pooled mean of 0.37 and a range of 0.22 to 0.77 for all samples.We may conclude that slow-growing or non-growing cells have low 0 -C ratios.The mean S:C ratio for all samples was 0.031, with a range of 0 016 to 0.084 for the sample means.A general conclus~on is that single-cell analyses of elemental composition give important information on the physiological conditions of cells and on possible nutrient limitations.The rationale for this is the assumption that changes in macromolecular composition are due to nutrient availability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Zooplankton grazing and growth: Scaling within the 2‐2,‐μm body size range
Hansen, P. J., Bjørnsen, P. K., & Hansen, B. W. (1997) · Limnology and Oceanography · doi:10.4319/lo.1997.42.4.0687 · Cited by 764
Life under extreme energy limitation: a synthesis of laboratory- and field-based investigations
Lever, M. A., Rogers, K. L., Lloyd, K. G., Overmann, J., Schink, B., Thauer, R. K., Hoehler, T. M., & Jørgensen, B. B. (2015) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1093/femsre/fuv020 · Cited by 378
Vrede, K., Heldal, M., Norland, S., & Bratbak, G. (2002) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.68.6.2965-2971.2002 · Cited by 331
Self-citationMetagenomics uncovers a new group of low GC and ultra-small marine Actinobacteria
Ghai, R., Mizuno, C. M., Picazo, A., Camacho, A., & Rodriguez-Valera, F. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02471 · Cited by 224
Methods to quantify biological contaminants in microalgae cultures
Di Caprio, F. (2020) · Algal Research · doi:10.1016/j.algal.2020.101943 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Fagerbakke, K., Heldal, M., & Norland, S.
- Venue
- Aquatic Microbial Ecology
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 15-27
- ISSN
- 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1564
- OpenAlex
- W2037081726
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/ame010015
- The paper
- Fagerbakke, K., Heldal, M., & Norland, S. (1996). Content of carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, sulfur and phosphorus in native aquatic and cultured bacteria. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame010015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.