The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prochlorococcus growth rate and contribution to primary production in the equatorial and subtropical North Pacific Ocean
Open accessAbstract
DNA synthesis and cell division of Prochlorococcus are tightly synchronized to the daily light cycle, therefore, cell division rates can be estimated from the fraction of cells in each cell cycle stage during a 24 h sampling period.The total mortality rate of Prochlorococcus can also be estimated from the difference between the observed cell abundance and the expected cell number projected from growth rate in that sampling period, providing an estlmate of grazing impact.Growth and mortality rates of Prochlorococcus were investigated at 2 statlons In the equatorial Pacific, as well as Station ALOHA in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean.Growth rate of Prochlorococcus remained high at all sites independent of the nitrate concentration.The maximum growth rate (up to 1 doubling d-') occurred at 70 m depth at the western equatorial Pacific site (166' E) and at 40 to 45 nl at the eastern equatorial Pacific site (150' W) and at Station ALOHA (22" 45' N, 158' W).Total mortality rates were roughly balanced by Prochlorococcus growth at all stations.Because of the phased cell cycle and continuous (if not evenly distributed) mortality, the abundance of Prochlorococcus at each depth could vary up to 2-fold between afternoon and midnight.Prochlorococcus production was estimated to contribute 9 and 39% to the total gross primary production in the eastern and western equatorial Pacific, respectively, and up to 82% in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean at Station ALOHA.Our results suggest Prochlorococcus are not severely nutrient-limited in the oligotrophic environment.Rapid nutrient recycling by grazing activity permits Prochlorococcus to contribute a significant fraction of the total primary production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ecology of prokaryotic viruses
Weinbauer, M. G. (2004) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.femsre.2003.08.001 · Cited by 1,771
Rae, B. D., Long, B. M., Badger, M. R., & Price, G. D. (2013) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.00061-12 · Cited by 409
Ting, C. S., Rocap, G., King, J., & Chisholm, S. W. (2002) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(02)02319-3 · Cited by 347
Identification of a SulP-type bicarbonate transporter in marine cyanobacteria
Price, G. D., Woodger, F. J., Badger, M. R., Howitt, S. M., & Tucker, L. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0405211101 · Cited by 331
Bench, S. R., Ilikchyan, I. N., Tripp, H. J., & Zehr, J. P. (2011) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00261 · Cited by 43
“…which are dominated by cyanobacteria in most of the world’s open oceans, are important in global marine biogeochemical cycles and account for half of global carbon fixation (Waterbury et al., 1986; Goericke and Welschmeyer, 1993; Liu et al., 1997; Partensky et al., 1999; Scanlan and West, 2002).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, H., Nolla, H., & Campbell, L.
- Venue
- Aquatic Microbial Ecology
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1997
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 39-47
- ISSN
- 0948-3055 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1564
- OpenAlex
- W2085018643
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prochlorococcus growth rate and contribution to primary production in the equatorial and subtropical North Pacific Ocean. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/ame012039
- The paper
- Liu, H., Nolla, H., & Campbell, L. (1997). Prochlorococcus growth rate and contribution to primary production in the equatorial and subtropical North Pacific Ocean. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame012039
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.