Cited by 43Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms

Two Strains of Crocosphaera watsonii with Highly Conserved Genomes are Distinguished by Strain-Specific Features

Open access
Bench, Shellie R., Ilikchyan, Irina N., Tripp, H. James, Zehr, Jonathan P.·2011·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

Unicellular nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria are important components of marine phytoplankton. Although non-nitrogen-fixing marine phytoplankton generally exhibit high gene sequence and genomic diversity, gene sequences of natural populations and isolated strains of Crocosphaerawatsonii, one of the two most abundant open ocean unicellular cyanobacteria groups, have been shown to be 98-100% identical. The low sequence diversity in Crocosphaera is a dramatic contrast to sympatric species of Prochlorococcus and Synechococcus, and raises the question of how genome differences can explain observed phenotypic diversity among Crocosphaera strains. Here we show, through whole genome comparisons of two phenotypically different strains, that there are strain-specific sequences in each genome, and numerous genome rearrangements, despite exceptionally low sequence diversity in shared genomic regions. Some of the strain-specific sequences encode functions that explain observed phenotypic differences, such as exopolysaccharide biosynthesis. The pattern of strain-specific sequences distributed throughout the genomes, along with rearrangements in shared sequences is evidence of significant genetic mobility that may be attributed to the hundreds of transposase genes found in both strains. Furthermore, such genetic mobility appears to be the main mechanism of strain divergence in Crocosphaera which do not accumulate DNA microheterogeneity over the vast majority of their genomes. The strain-specific sequences found in this study provide tools for future physiological studies, as well as genetic markers to help determine the relative abundance of phenotypes in natural populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00261

Cites

71 of 73 references verified2 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have shown that a large proportion of transposases and RTase constituted long repeated sequences in some cyanobacteria.

    “Previous studies have shown that a large proportion of the transposases and RTase constituted the long repeated sequences in some cyanobacteria.57–60”

    From Whole genomic DNA sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of<i>Arthrospira platensis</i>: high genome plasticity and genetic diversity (2016) · cites this paper as [57]

    Materials and Methods (Transposase annotation; page unavailable) describes highly repetitive ORFs in the cyanobacterium Crocosphaera watsonii that were reassessed as transposase genes. Results and Discussion (Transposase gene comparisons; page unavailable) reports many identical copies of transposase sequences. The paper does not establish that these are long repeated sequences or address RTase, so those parts of the claim are unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Duplicated genes were usually adjacently located or duplication-linked with many unknown functions, some annotated by one or two of RTase, transposase, and integrase, and duplicated fragments varied in size from several to dozens of kilobases.

    “Another significant characteristic of duplicated genes was that they were usually adjacently located or duplication-linked with a plenty of unknown functions, some of which can be annotated by one or two of the three enzymes (RTase, transposase, and integrase), and these duplicated fragments varied in size from several to dozens of kilobases.57–59”

    From Whole genomic DNA sequencing and comparative genomic analysis of<i>Arthrospira platensis</i>: high genome plasticity and genetic diversity (2016) · cites this paper as [57]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bench, S. R., Ilikchyan, I. N., Tripp, H. J., & Zehr, J. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Zehr, Jonathan P.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2011
Volume
2
Pages
261-261
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019431867
Cited by
43
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0424599)
  • Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (EF0424599)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Keywords
Crocosphaera watsonii, genome rearrangement, transposase, exopolysaccharide biosynthesis, phenotypic diversity, nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria, marine phytoplankton, strain divergence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review