The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis
Open accessAbstract
Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis is a fungus belonging to the Phylum Chytridiomycota, Class Chytridiomycetes, Order Chytridiales, and is the highly infectious aetiological agent responsible for a potentially fatal disease, chytridiomycosis, which is currently decimating many of the world's amphibian populations. The fungus infects 2 amphibian orders (Anura and Caudata), 14 families and at least 200 species and is responsible for at least 1 species extinction. Whilst the origin of the agent and routes of transmission are being debated, it has been recognised that successful management of the disease will require effective sampling regimes and detection assays. We have developed a range of unique sampling protocols together with diagnostic assays for the detection of B. dendrobatidis in both living and deceased tadpoles and adults. Here, we formally present our data and discuss them in respect to assay sensitivity, specificity, repeatability and reproducibility. We suggest that compliance with the recommended protocols will avoid the generation of spurious results, thereby providing the international scientific and regulatory community with a set of validated procedures which will assist in the successful management of chytridiomycosis in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Batrachochytrium salamandrivorans sp. nov. causes lethal chytridiomycosis in amphibians
Martel, A., Spitzen-van der Sluijs, A., Blooi, M., Bert, W., Ducatelle, R., Fisher, M. C., Woeltjes, A., Bosman, W., Chiers, K., Bossuyt, F., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1307356110 · Cited by 632
Enzootic and epizootic dynamics of the chytrid fungal pathogen of amphibians
Briggs, C. J., Knapp, R. A., & Vredenburg, V. T. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0912886107 · Cited by 507
Langhammer, P. F., Burrowes, P. A., Lips, K. R., Bryant, A. B., & Collins, J. P. (2014) · Journal of Wildlife Diseases · doi:10.7589/2013-10-268 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Hyatt, A., Boyle, D., Olsen, V, Boyle, D., Berger, L., Obendorf, D., Dalton, A., Kriger, K., Hero, M., Hines, H., Phillott, R., Campbell, R., Marantelli, G., Gleason, F., & Colling, A.
- Venue
- Diseases of Aquatic Organisms
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2007-01-18
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-192
- ISSN
- 0177-5103 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1580
- OpenAlex
- W2121354575
- Cited by
- 799
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 25.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/dao073175
- The paper
- Hyatt, A., Boyle, D., Olsen, V, Boyle, D., Berger, L., Obendorf, D., Dalton, A., Kriger, K., Hero, M., Hines, H., Phillott, R., Campbell, R., Marantelli, G., Gleason, F., & Colling, A. (2007). Diagnostic assays and sampling protocols for the detection of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao073175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.