Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 314

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. I Carbon

Open access
Hall, POJ, Anderson, LG, Holby, O, Kollberg, S, Samuelsson, M-O·1990·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Carbon fluxes in a marine trout cage farm in the Gullmar Fjord, western Sweden, were measured to investigate how much of the carbon supplied to the farm was recovered in harvest, how much was lost to the environment, and the properties and fate of this environmental loss.The measured fluxes included fish food, juveniles, harvest, fish loss (death and escape), sedimentation from the cages, and benthc release measured with diver-operated flux chambers and a gas collection unit in situ.Carbon mass balances for the farm, based on the measured fluxes (flux method), were constructed for each of 2 consecutive growing seasons.Another mass balance (accumulation method) was based on the total carbon input with food and juveniles to the farm since it was started, the removal of carbon with harvested fish and fish loss, and the recovery of carbon in the sediment originating from the farm after 7 growing seasons.Some 21 to 22 % of the total carbon input to the farm was recovered in harvest, fish loss constituted 1 to 3 %, and 75 to 78 % (or 878 to 952 kg C per tonne of fish produced) was lost to the aquatic environment.On a seasonal basis and of the carbon input to the farm, solute release from the cages (probably CO2 produced during fish respiration and excreted urea) removed 4 to 49 %, sedimentation of faeces and excess food removed 29 to 71 %, flux from the farm sediment of dissolved and gaseous carbon (total carbonate [C,], methane and dissolved organic carbon) transferred 2 to 6 O/o back to the overlying water, and 23 to 69 % was accumulated in the sediment.(Ranges of values represent inter-seasonal variability.)The long-term (7 seasons) sediment accumulation of carbon amounted to 18 ' Yo of the total carbon input to the farm.Of the carbon deposited on the sediment surface 3 to 20 '/o was released back to the overlying water seasonally.C, dominated the annual benthic fluxes.Loss to the environment of dissolved carbon [the sum of solute release from the cages and benthic flux) amounted to between 6 and 55 % of the carbon input to the farm (or 9 to 71 'X of the total environmental loss) on a seasonal basis, and 5 8 % (or 76% of the total environmental loss) on a long-term basis.This study constitutes the first step in an assessment of the eutrophication caused by the fish farm.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps061061

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 314

Metadata

Authors
Hall, P., Anderson, L., Holby, O., Kollberg, S., & Samuelsson, M.-O.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1990
Volume
61
Pages
61-73
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2082133536
Cited by
314
References
0
FWCI
3.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. I Carbon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps061061
The paper
Hall, P., Anderson, L., Holby, O., Kollberg, S., & Samuelsson, M.-O. (1990). Chemical fluxes and mass balances in a marine fish cage farm. I Carbon. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps061061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.