The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton species
Open accessAbstract
Natural phytoplankton populations from both Antarctic and tropical waters were exposed to solar radiation to determine the effects of ultraviolet radiation (UVR) on rates of photosynthesis.Radiation in the UV-A region (320 to 400 nm) was responsible for over 50 % of the total inhibition due to UVR, with less than 50 % due to UV-B (280 to 320 nm).Wavelengths c305 nm, which is the spectral region most enhanced under conditions of low ozone concentrations in the atmosphere, accounted for only 15 to 20% of the total inhibition due to UV-B radiation.Under high-light conditions on sunny days, photosynthetic rates were increased 200 to 300 % by screening off all UVR below 378 nm.When the average UVR (295 to 385 nm) during the incubation period was below a threshold value of 5 to 10 W m-', there was no significant depression of photosynthetic rates.Microscopic examinations of a phytoplankton population which was allowed to grow for 5 d under high solar irradiance indicated that UVR is more inhibitory to microplankton than to nanoplankton, and that it induced the formation of resting spores in diatom species of the genus Chaetoceros.Phytoplankton from tropical waters showed marked resistance to UVR as compared to Antarctic phytoplankton.Under the highest light conditions an increase in photosynthetic rates of 10 to 20 % was recorded in some experiments by screening off all UVR c 3 7 8 nm, but when data from all experiments with samples from surface waters in the tropics were analyzed, there was no significant difference between samples with or without natural solar UVR.Phytoplankton samples from below the pycnocline in tropical waters, however, were very sensitive to solar radiation, suggesting that the resistance shown by phytoplankton from surface waters reflects a photoadaptive process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The wavelengths in sunlight effective in producing skin cancer: a theoretical analysis
Setlow, R. B. (1974) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.71.9.3363 · Cited by 1,125
Cited by
Action spectrum for DMA damage in alfalfa lowers predicted impact of ozone depletion
Quaite, F. E., Sutherland, B. M., & Sutherland, J. C. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358576a0 · Cited by 314
Effects of UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial and Aquatic Primary Producers
Day, T. A., & Neale, P. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150434 · Cited by 211
Singh, S. P., Klisch, M., Sinha, R. P., & Häder, D. (2008) · Photochemistry and Photobiology · doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00376.x · Cited by 100
Ha, S.-Y., Lee, Y., Kim, M.-S., Kumar, K., & Shin, K.-H. (2015) · Marine Drugs · doi:10.3390/md13116740 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Helbling, E., Villafane, V, Ferrario, M., & Holm-Hansen, O.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 80
- Pages
- 89-100
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2049046055
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps080089
- The paper
- Helbling, E., Villafane, V, Ferrario, M., & Holm-Hansen, O. (1992). Impact of natural ultraviolet radiation on rates of photosynthesis and on specific marine phytoplankton species. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps080089
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.