Cited by 236Marine and fisheries researchMarine and coastal plant biologyFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Variability in growth rates of juvenile fishes in different estuarine habitats

Open access
Sogard, SM·1992·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Estuaries are vital nursery grounds for many marine fishes.During initial estuarine residence, juvenile fishes presumably benefit greatly from rapid growth, which can diminish susceptibility to size-selective predators.To measure the degree of variability in growth rates across different estuarine sites and habitats.I conducted caging experiments with 3 species (Pseudopleuronectes americanus, Tautoga onitis, and Gobiosoma bosci) at 4 sites in New Jersey, USA, estuaries.Two sites were in an estuary with dense eelgrass Zostera marina beds (Little Egg Harbor) and 2 were in an estuary lacking eelgrass but supporting patchy accumulations of the macroalgae Ulva lactuca (Great Bay).Experiments were conducted in vegetated (either Zostera or Ulva) and unvegetated habitats at each site.Relative differences in growth rates among the 4 sites and between the 2 habitats were generally maintained across experiments withln species, suggesting a consistency in foraging value.For all 3 species, growth .washighest at a Great Bay site and generally lowest at a httle Egg Harbor site.The presence of vegetation (either Zostera or Ulva) was beneficial to growth only for T onitis.Observed patterns in water temperature, sediment structure, and food availability were potential factors effecting the observed differences in growth rates.Natural densities of the 3 fish species were quantified and compared to the results of growth experiments to determine if there were trade-offs between rapid growth and other attributes of habitat quality.P. americanus and T onitis were more abundant in areas supporting faster growth, but the complete absence of tautog from unvegetated substrates suggested some degree of habitat avoidance.A clear trade-off between habitat selection and foraging quality occurred for G. bosci; gobies were most abundant inside eelgrass beds, which supported the poorest growth rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps085035

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Cushing, D. H (1974). The possible density-dependence of larval mortal~ty and adult mortality In fishes. In: Blaxter, J. H. S. (ed.) The early life history of fish. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, p. 103-112
  2. Grover, J. J . (1982). The comparative feeding ecology of five inshore, marine fishes off Long Island, New York. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, New Jersey
  3. Nero, L. L. (1976). The natural history of the naked goby Gobiosoma bosci (Perciformes: Gobiidae). M.Sc. thesis, Old Dominion Univ., Norfolk, Virginia
  4. Snedecor, G. W.. Cochran, W. G. (1980). Statistical methods, 7th edn Iowa State University Press, Ames
  5. Sogard, S. M. (1990). Parameters of habitat quality for epiben- thic fishes and decapod crustaceans in New Jersey estuaries. Ph.D. thesis, Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, New Jersey
  6. Sogard, S. M.. Able, K. W (in press). Growth variation of newly settled winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes arnericanus) in New Jersey estuaries as determined by otolith microstructure. Neth. J . Sea Res.
  7. Sogard, S. M., Able, K. W., Fahay, M. P. (in press). Early life history of the tautog, Tautoga onitis, in the Mid-Atlantic Bight. Fish. Bull. U.S. Virnstein, R. W., Mikkelsen, P. S., Cairns, K. D., Capone, M. A. (1983). Seagrass beds versus sand bottoms: the trophic importance of their associated benthic invertebrates Fla Scient. 46: 363-381

Authors
Sogard, S.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Sogard, SM
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1992
Volume
85
Pages
35-53
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W1979455672
Cited by
236
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
Funders
Electric Power Research Institute
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Marine and coastal plant biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
estuarine nursery habitat, eelgrass beds, Zostera marina, Ulva lactuca, winter flounder, Tautoga onitis, habitat avoidance, caging experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review