Cited by 26Fish Ecology and Management StudiesMarine and fisheries researchFish Biology and Ecology Studies

Rearing in natural and recovering tidal wetlands enhances growth and life‐history diversity of Columbia Estuary tributary coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch population

Craig, B. E., Simenstad, C. A., Bottom, D. L.·2014·Journal of Fish Biology

Abstract

This study provides evidence of the importance of tributary tidal wetlands to local coho salmon Oncorhynchus kisutch populations and life‐history diversity. Subyearling and, to a lesser extent, yearling O. kisutch life histories utilized various estuary habitats within the Grays River, a tidal freshwater tributary of the Columbia River estuary, including restoring emergent wetlands and natural forested wetlands. Migration timing data, size distributions, estuary residence and scale patterns suggest a predominance of subyearling migrant life histories, including several that involve extended periods of estuary rearing. Estuarine‐rearing subyearling O. kisutch exhibited the greatest overall growth rates; the highest growth rates were seen in fish that utilized restoring emergent wetlands. These results contrast with studies conducted in the main‐stem Columbia River estuary, which captured few O. kisutch, of which nearly all were hatchery‐origin yearling smolts. Restoration and preservation of peripheral and tributary wetland habitats, such as those in the Grays River, could play an important role in the recovery of natural O. kisutch populations in the Columbia River and elsewhere.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jfb.12433

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Juvenile salmonids grow during residence in the LCRE.

    “This same observation suggests that juvenile salmonids grow during residence in the LCRE, a finding that is corroborated by the review of global literature (Table 7 and Table 8), and which we accept because it is biologically plausible that consumption of sufficient food leads to growth (Craig et al. 2014).”

    From Evidence‐based evaluation of the cumulative effects of ecosystem restoration (2016) · cites this paper as Craig et al. 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Iwamoto R. N., 1977, Estuarine Survival of Juvenile Salmonids: A Review of the Literature
  2. 10.1139/f01-134 · DOI
  3. Merrell T. R. J., 1978, Symposium on Wetland Functions and Values: the State of our Understanding, 256
  4. Murphy M. L., 1984, A Stream Ecosystem in Old Growth Forest in Southeast Alaska, 89
  5. 10.1139/f97-178 · DOI
  6. Simenstad C. A., 1982, Proceedings of the North Pacific Aquaculture Symposium, 21
  7. Skeesick D. G., 1970, The fall immigration of juvenile coho salmon into a small tributary, Research Report Fish Commission of Oregon, 2, 90
  8. Thomas D. W., 1983, Changes in the Columbia River Estuary Habitat Types over the Past Century
  9. Tschaplinski P., 1982, Aspects of the Population Biology of Estuary‐Reared and Stream‐Reared Juvenile Coho Salmon in Carnation Creek: A Summary of Current Research
  10. Tschaplinski P. J., 1988, Proceedings of the Workshop: Applying 15 Years of Carnation Creek Results, 123
  11. Zimmerman M., 2009, 2009 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia
  12. Zimmerman M., 2010, 2010 Wild Coho Forecasts for Puget Sound, Washington Coast, and Lower Columbia
  13. Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board(2010).Washington Lower Columbia Salmon Recovery and Fish and Wildlife Subbasin Plan‐Final Vol. II Chapter C‐Grays Subbasin. Longview WA: Lower Columbia Fish Recovery Board. Available athttp://www.lcfrb.gen.wa.us/Recovery%20Plans/RP%20Frontpage.htm/(last accessed 14 April 2014).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craig, B. E., Simenstad, C. A., & Bottom, D. L.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service (US)
Corresponding author
Craig, B. E.
Venue
Journal of Fish Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-05-28
Volume
85
Issue
1
Pages
31-51
ISSN
  • 0022-1112 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-8649
OpenAlex
W1892770396
Cited by
26
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Fish Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bonneville Power Administration
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
Keywords
coho salmon, tidal wetlands, life history diversity, wetland restoration, emergent wetlands, forested wetlands, fish growth rate, migration timing, Columbia River estuary, population recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Washington, Oncorhynchus kisutch, Animal Migration, Rivers, Wetlands, Estuaries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review