Cited by 85Marine and fisheries researchIchthyology and Marine BiologyEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Harmful effects of sediment-induced turbidity on juvenile fish in estuaries

Lowe, ML, Morrison, MA, Taylor, RB·2015·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 539:241-254 (2015) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11496 Harmful effects of sediment-induced turbidity on juvenile fish in estuaries M. L. Lowe1,2,*, M. A. Morrison1, R. B. Taylor2 1National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Private Bag 99940, Auckland, New Zealand 2Leigh Marine Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, University of Auckland, PO Box 349, Warkworth 0941, New Zealand *Corresponding author: meredith.lowe@niwa.co.nz ABSTRACT: Estuaries are important nursery habitats for juvenile fishes of many species, but are under increasing pressure from anthropogenic stressors. We examined the impacts of suspended sediments/turbidity on the foraging success and health of juvenile snapper Pagrus auratus F. Sparidae, which are abundant in many northern New Zealand estuaries and comprise a major coastal fishery as adults. In the laboratory, short-term exposure to turbidity (range <10 to 160 NTU) reduced foraging success of juvenile snapper, while month-long exposure caused higher rates of gill ventilation, gill deformation (epithelial hyperplasia, fusion of the lamellae), weight loss and mortality. In 7 northern New Zealand estuaries with varying catchment land uses, total suspended sediments were negatively correlated with capture rates of juvenile snapper and the conditio…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps11496

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lowe, M., Morrison, M., & Taylor, R.
Corresponding author
Lowe, ML
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2015-11-12
Volume
539
Pages
241-254
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2344753136
Cited by
85
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Marine Ecology Progress Series (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ichthyology and Marine Biology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
turbidity, suspended sediment, juvenile fish, estuaries, Pagrus auratus, nursery grounds, foraging success, fish condition, gill parasites, catchment land use, sediment runoff, zooplankton diet, recruitment (biology), seagrass meadows, fisheries management, water quality, watershed management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review