The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of a marine reserve on the distribution of coral reef fishes in Barbados
Open accessAbstract
High population densities of larger fish withln reserves could result in emigrat~on of fish to surrounding non-reserve areas, producing a gradient of abundance and mean size across the reserve boundaries.The difference in fish abundance and size between reserve and non-reserve should be higher for sedentary than for mobile species and for highly catchable than for less catchable species.To test these hypotheses we estimated the abundance and size of fishes by trapping and visual census on fringlng reefs in Barbados: 5 reefs with~n the 2.2 km of the Barbados Marine Reserve (BMR) and 8 reefs in the non-reserve (NR) area within 4 km of the reserve boundaries.The abundance of large, trappable size fish of all species combined was higher in the BMR than in the NR, but abundance of small, nontrappable fish did not differ between BMR and NR.Trap catches decreased gradually with distance from the BMR center, but this gradient of abundance was less evident in visual census counts of trappable size fishes of all species combined, and not apparent in trap or visual census estimates of abundance for individual species.Mean size was larger in the BMR than in the NR for 18 out of 24 species.The relative differences in both abundance and size between BMR and NR did not differ between mobile and sedentary fish taxa.However, for sedentary taxa, the relative differences in abundance and size increased with trappability (the vulnerability to traps, which are the most common fishing method).These patterns suggest that the BMR does protect the fish community from fishing mortality and that em~gration rates are generally low.Trappability and mobility depend on complex behavioral characteristics of fishes and are potentially important for the functioning of marine reserves.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impacts of Biodiversity Loss on Ocean Ecosystem Services
Worm, B., Barbier, E. B., Beaumont, N., Duffy, J. E., Folke, C., Halpern, B. S., Jackson, J. B. C., Lotze, H. K., Micheli, F., Palumbi, S. R., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1132294 · Cited by 4,544
Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis
Lester, S., Halpern, B., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B., Gaines, S., Airamé, S., & Warner, R. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08029 · Cited by 1,447
THE IMPACT OF MARINE RESERVES: DO RESERVES WORK AND DOES RESERVE SIZE MATTER?
Halpern, B. S. (2003) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0117:tiomrd]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,378
Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves
Babcock, R., Kelly, S., Shears, N., Walker, J., & Willis, T. (1999) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps189125 · Cited by 434
MARINE RESERVE BENEFITS LOCAL FISHERIES
Russ, G. R., Alcala, A. C., Maypa, A. P., Calumpong, H. P., & White, A. T. (2004) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/03-5076 · Cited by 401
Metadata
- Authors
- Rakitin, A., & Kramer, D.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1996
- Volume
- 131
- Pages
- 97-113
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2025129305
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of a marine reserve on the distribution of coral reef fishes in Barbados. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps131097
- The paper
- Rakitin, A., & Kramer, D. (1996). Effect of a marine reserve on the distribution of coral reef fishes in Barbados. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps131097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.