The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves
Open accessAbstract
No-take' marine reserves provide a valuable tool for managing marine resources as well as for providing relatively undisturbed habitat with which to assess modifications to ecosystems.We studied 2 marine reserves in northeastern New Zealand, the Leigh Marine Reserve (established 1975) and Tawharanui Marine Park (established 1982) in order to assess whether changes in protected predator populations had resulted in other indirect changes to grazers and consequently to algal abundance.Estimates of abundance of the most common demersal predatory fish Pagrus auratus indicated that adults of this species (i.e.large enough to prey upon urchins) were at least 5.75 and 8.70 times more abundant inside reserves than in adjacent unprotected areas.Overall, P auratus were also much larger inside reserves with mean total lengths of 316 mm compared with 186 mm in fished areas.The spiny lobster Jasus edwardsii displayed similar trends, and was approximately 1.6 to 3.7 times more abundant inside the reserves than outside.Lobsters within the reserves had a mean carapace length of 109.9 mm, compared with 93.5 mm outside the reserves.In one of the reserves, densities of the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus had declined from 4.9 to 1.4 m-2 since 1978 in areas formerly dominated by it.Consequently, kelp forests were more extensive in 1998 than they were at the time of reserve creation.Urchin-dominated barrens occupied only 14 % of available reef substratum in reserves as opposed to 40"4 in unprotected areas.These changes in community structure, which have persisted since at least 1994, demonstrate not only higher trophic complexity than anticipated in Australasian ecosystems but also increased primary and secondary productivity in marine reserves as a consequence of protection.Trends inside reserves indicate large-scale reduction of benthic primary production as an indirect result of fishing activity in unprotected areas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Dalsgaard, J., Froese, R., & Torres, F. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.279.5352.860 · Cited by 4,743
Disturbance of the Seabed by Mobile Fishing Gear: A Comparison to Forest Clearcutting
Watling, L., & Norse, E. A. (1998) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.0120061180.x · Cited by 800
Decline of the Chesapeake Bay oyster population: a century of habitat destruction and overfishing
Rothschild, B., Ault, J., Goulletquer, P., & Héral, M. (1994) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps111029 · Cited by 539
Sala, E., Boudouresque, C. F., & Harmelin-Vivien, M. (1998) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546364 · Cited by 481
Advances in marine conservation: the role of marine protected areas
Tundi Agardy, M. (1994) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(94)90297-6 · Cited by 417
Marine Reserves: Rates and Patterns of Recovery and Decline of Large Predatory Fish
Russ, G. R., & Alcala, A. C. (1996) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.2307/2269497 · Cited by 303
Effect of a marine reserve on the distribution of coral reef fishes in Barbados
Rakitin, A., & Kramer, D. (1996) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps131097 · Cited by 210
Taylor, R. (1998) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps172037 · Cited by 164
Evolutionary consequences of food chain length in kelp forest communities.
Steinberg, P. D., Estes, J. A., & Winter, F. C. (1995) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.18.8145 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Biological effects within no-take marine reserves: a global synthesis
Lester, S., Halpern, B., Grorud-Colvert, K., Lubchenco, J., Ruttenberg, B., Gaines, S., Airamé, S., & Warner, R. (2009) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps08029 · Cited by 1,447
Benefits beyond boundaries: the fishery effects of marine reserves
Gell, F. R., & Roberts, C. M. (2003) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(03)00189-7 · Cited by 936
Decadal trends in marine reserves reveal differential rates of change in direct and indirect effects
Babcock, R. C., Shears, N. T., Alcala, A. C., Barrett, N. S., Edgar, G. J., Lafferty, K. D., McClanahan, T. R., & Russ, G. R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0908012107 · Cited by 580
Self-citationDangerous targets? Unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas
Agardy, T., Bridgewater, P., Crosby, M. P., Day, J., Dayton, P. K., Kenchington, R., Laffoley, D., McConney, P., Murray, P. A., Parks, J. E., et al. (2003) · Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems · doi:10.1002/aqc.583 · Cited by 537
Palumbi, S. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.29.062403.102254 · Cited by 494
Metadata
- Authors
- Babcock, R., Kelly, S., Shears, N., Walker, J., & Willis, T.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 189
- Pages
- 125-134
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W2023749885
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps189125
- The paper
- Babcock, R., Kelly, S., Shears, N., Walker, J., & Willis, T. (1999). Changes in community structure in temperate marine reserves. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps189125
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.