Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 271

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Natural diet and grazing rate of the temperate sponge Dysidea avara (Demospongiae, Dendroceratida) throughout an annual cycle

Open access
Ribes, M, Coma, R, Gili, JM·1999·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

Sponges are one of the major invertebrate groups inhabiting hard-bottom communities worldwide.In this study, we measured in situ rates of grazing on DOC (dissolved organic carbon), POC (particulate organic carbon), and pico-, nano-and microplankton for the common temperate sponge Dysidea avara throughout a yearly cycle.The natural diet of the species was h~ghly heterogeneous and included procaryotes (heterotrophc bacteria, Prochlorococcus sp., Synechococcus sp.) and eucaryotes (protozoa, phytoplankton, and ciliates) ranging in size from 0.5 * 0.3 (heterotrophic bacteria) to 70 k 0.3 pm (pennate diatoms).Procaryotic cell clearance rates were higher than those for the other groups, suggesting a higher grazing efficiency upon these prey types.Specific clearance rates showed a pattern of decrease with sponge size increase, although they did not vary with prey concentration or with temperature.Overall, procaryotes contributed 74 k 14 % of the total ingested carbon, pico-and nanoeucaryotes contributed 11 i 3"&, and phytoplankton contnbuted 11 i IOU:>.Therefore, Dysidea avara obtained 85% of its ingested carbon from the fract~on smaller than 5 pm and 15% from the fractlon larger than 5 pm.Howcver, the partial contributions of the different groups varied seasonally, following the planktonic composition of the water column Dur~ng winter, phytoplankton was an important component of the total uptake [26°<)), whereas durlng the rest of the year it contnbuted less than 7 % of the total uptake.The capacity of this sponge to feed on a broad size range of prey allowed it to maintain rather constant food uptake throughout the year.These results show the importance of particle type (size) for selective uptake in sponges, as well as the relevance of phytoplankton in the sponge diet.This trophic plasticity may represent an advantage for the species because it attenuates the effects of seasonal fluctuations in the planktonic community.This plasticity in trophic ecology may be one of the main factors contributing to the worldwide abundance and distribution of sponges despite large spatial and temporal variations in food sources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps176179

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Cited by

See all 271

Metadata

Authors
Ribes, M., Coma, R., & Gili, J.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
1999
Volume
176
Pages
179-190
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2042574228
Cited by
271
References
24
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural diet and grazing rate of the temperate sponge Dysidea avara (Demospongiae, Dendroceratida) throughout an annual cycle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps176179
The paper
Ribes, M., Coma, R., & Gili, J. (1999). Natural diet and grazing rate of the temperate sponge Dysidea avara (Demospongiae, Dendroceratida) throughout an annual cycle. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps176179

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.