The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling
Open accessAbstract
The benthic macrofauna of a group of small seamounts south of Tasmania was surveyed with a dredge and camera to assess the impact of trawling for orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus; Trachichthyidae) and the efficacy of a proposed marine reserve.The seamounts were generally 300 to 600 m high and the peaks ranged from 660 to 1700 m depth.The fauna was diverse: 262 species of invertebrates and 37 species of fishes were enumerated, compared with 598 species of invertebrates previously reported from seamounts worldwide.On seamounts that peaked at depths <1400 m and that had not been heavily fished, the invertebrate fauna was dense, diverse and dominated by suspension feeders, including a matrix-forming colonial hard coral (Solenosmilia variabilis) and a variety of hard and soft (gorgonian and antipatharian) corals, hydroids, sponges and suspension-feeding ophiuroids and sea stars.Of the invertebrate species, 24 to 43% were new to science, and between 16 and 33% appeared to be restricted to the seamount environment.Trawl operations effectively removed the reef aggregate from the most heavily fished seamounts.The benthic biomass of samples from unfished seamounts was 106% greater than from heavily fished seamounts and the number of species per sample was 46% greater.Living S. variabilis was not found on seamounts peaking at depths >1400 m.These seamounts were dominated by sea urchins and had lower biomass and fewer species per sample.However, few species were restricted to either the shallowest or deepest depths sampled.The fauna unique to the region's seamounts appears to be adequately represented within a recently established 'Marine Protected Area' that encloses 12 seamounts that peak at depths >1150 m.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Deep, diverse and definitely different: Unique attributes of the world’s largest ecosystem
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Brandt, A., Danovaro, R., De Mol, B., Escobar, E., German, C. R., Levin, L. A., Martinez Arbizu, P., Menot, L., Buhl-Mortensen, P., et al. (2010) · Biogeosciences · doi:10.5194/bg-7-2851-2010 · Cited by 913
Man and the Last Great Wilderness: Human Impact on the Deep Sea
Ramirez-Llodra, E., Tyler, P. A., Baker, M. C., Bergstad, O. A., Clark, M. R., Escobar, E., Levin, L. A., Menot, L., Rowden, A. A., Smith, C. R., et al. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022588 · Cited by 850
Cold-Water Corals and Ecosystems
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/3-540-27673-4 · Cited by 666
State of the World’s Fisheries
Hilborn, R., Branch, T. A., Ernst, B., Magnusson, A., Minte-Vera, C. V., Scheuerell, M. D., & Valero, J. L. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105509 · Cited by 389
The deep-sea floor ecosystem: current status and prospects of anthropogenic change by the year 2025
Glover, A. G., & Smith, C. R. (2003) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892903000225 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Koslow, J., Gowlett-Holmes, K., Lowry, J., O'Hara, T., Poore, G., & Williams, A.
- Venue
- Marine Ecology Progress Series
- Publisher
- Inter-Research Science Center
- Published
- 2001
- Volume
- 213
- Pages
- 111-125
- ISSN
- 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
- 1616-1599
- OpenAlex
- W1992620522
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps213111
- The paper
- Koslow, J., Gowlett-Holmes, K., Lowry, J., O'Hara, T., Poore, G., & Williams, A. (2001). Seamount benthic macrofauna off southern Tasmania: community structure and impacts of trawling. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps213111
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.