Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 951

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows

Open access
Heck Hay, KL, Hays, G, Orth, RJ·2003·Marine Ecology Progress Series

Abstract

The vast majority of published papers concerning seagrass meadows contain statements to the effect that seagrass beds serve as important nurseries for many species.We reviewed more than 200 papers that were relevant to the nursery role hypothesis.We used both vote counting and meta-analytic techniques to evaluate whether the body of previous studies that report seagrass meadows to be nursery grounds actually contain data that support this proposition.We restricted our analyses to papers that compared seagrass beds to other habitats, and examined data on a variety of well-studied species concerning their density, growth, survival and migration to adult habitat.Within this group of papers, we considered potential factors that could influence the nursery function (e.g.location, or laboratory vs field studies).We also evaluated case histories of well-documented largescale seagrass losses on the nursery function.Major results were consistent with the expectations that abundance, growth and survival were greater in seagrass than in unstructured habitats.Abundance data also suggested that seagrass beds in the Northern Hemisphere might be more important as nursery areas than those in the Southern Hemisphere.Surprisingly, few significant differences existed in abundance, growth or survival when seagrass meadows were compared to other structured habitats, such as oyster or cobble reefs, or macroalgal beds.Nor were there decreases in harvests of commercially important species that could clearly be attributed to significant seagrass declines in 3 wellstudied areas.However, there were decreased abundances of juveniles of commercially important species in these areas, suggesting a strong link between seagrass abundance and those of juvenile finfish and shellfish.One important implication of these results is that structure per se, rather than the type of structure, appears to be an important determinant of nursery value.Clearly, more rigorous studies that test all aspects of the nursery role hypothesis are clearly needed for seagrass meadows as well as other structured habitats.The results of such studies will allow better decisions to be made concerning the conservation and restoration of marine habitats.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3354/meps253123

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 951

Metadata

Authors
Heck Hay, K., Hays, G., & Orth, R.
Venue
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Published
2003
Volume
253
Pages
123-136
ISSN
  • 0171-8630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1616-1599
OpenAlex
W2133741276
Cited by
951
References
4
FWCI
22.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3354/meps253123
The paper
Heck Hay, K., Hays, G., & Orth, R. (2003). Critical evaluation of the nursery role hypothesis for seagrass meadows. Marine Ecology Progress Series. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps253123

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.