The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Visual Side Effects of Scopolamine/ Dextroamphetamine Among Parabolic Fliers
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Scopolamine/dextroamphetamine has been used to combat motion sickness generated aboard research aircraft for decades. While it has shown to be effective, previous studies differ as to the presence of visual side effects secondary to scopolamine's anticholinergic properties. This study sought to quantify any such effects in order to determine if they are operationally significant. METHODS: Fliers in NASA's Reduced Gravity Program received a weight-based dose of scopolamine/ dextroamphetamine prior to boarding the aircraft. Measurements of pupil size, visual acuity, and accommodation were taken in identical conditions using subjects' dominant eyes prior to medication administration and again after landing. We enrolled 131 subjects ages 18-48. Pre- and postflight measurements of pupil size and acuity were available for 125 subjects. RESULTS: Average pupil size increased by 1.1 mm (95% CI 0.9-1.2). Only 1.6% of subjects experienced a change in visual acuity of greater than 10 ft. The average near-point accommodation changed from 8.61 to 7.84 diopters, a difference of -0.77 (-1.01 to -0.53) diopters or 1.34 cm (0.87-1.81). Increasing age also correlated significantly with worsening change in accommodation. DISCUSSION: This study found statistically significant changes in pupil size and near point accommodation that do not appear to be clinically important. No significant decrement in acuity was noted. While direct effects on in-flight performance could not be assessed, the use of scopolamine/dextroamphetamine among fliers aboard research aircraft does not appear to yield visual side effects sufficient to compromise later ground operations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“| Scopolamine + | p.o. (0.4-1.2 mg+5 mg) | 0.5-1 h before MS | Parabolic flight MS | [179] |”
From Motion Sickness: Current Knowledge and Recent Advance. (2016) · cites this paper as [179]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Motion Sickness: Current Knowledge and Recent Advance.
Zhang, L., Wang, J., Qi, R., Pan, L., Li, M., & Cai, Y. (2016) · CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/cns.12468 · Cited by 216
Metadata
- Authors
- Makowski, A. L., Lindgren, K., & Locke, J. P.
- Affiliations
- St. Joseph Regional Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine
- Publisher
- Aerospace Medical Association
- Published
- 2011-07-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 683-688
- ISSN
- 0001-9402 (ISSN-L)
- 0095-6562
- OpenAlex
- W2071233956
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Drug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
- Keywords
- anticholinergic effects, pupil size, visual acuity, parabolic flight, reduced gravity, in-flight performance
- MeSH terms
- Accommodation, Ocular, Adolescent, Adult, Aerospace Medicine, Dextroamphetamine, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Scopolamine, Vision, Ocular, Visual Acuity, Cholinergic Antagonists, Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Side Effects of Scopolamine/ Dextroamphetamine Among Parabolic Fliers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3357/asem.2750.2011
- The paper
- Makowski, A. L., Lindgren, K., & Locke, J. P. (2011). Visual Side Effects of Scopolamine/ Dextroamphetamine Among Parabolic Fliers. Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3357/asem.2750.2011